TMEM16A blockers T16Ainh‐A01 and benzbromarone do not modulate the regulation of sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation in humans in vivo

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Do transmembrane member 16A (TMEM16A) blockers modulate the activation of heat loss responses of sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation? What are the main finding and its importance? Relative to the vehicle control site, TMEM16A blockers T16Ain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental physiology 2022-08, Vol.107 (8), p.844-853
Hauptverfasser: Fujii, Naoto, Amano, Tatsuro, Kenny, Glen P., Mündel, Toby, Lei, Tze‐Huan, Honda, Yasushi, Kondo, Narihiko, Nishiyasu, Takeshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:New Findings What is the central question of this study? Do transmembrane member 16A (TMEM16A) blockers modulate the activation of heat loss responses of sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation? What are the main finding and its importance? Relative to the vehicle control site, TMEM16A blockers T16Ainh‐A01 and benzbromarone had no effect on sweat rate or cutaneous vascular conductance during whole‐body heating inducing a 1.1 ± 0.1°C increase in core temperature above baseline resting levels. These results suggest that TMEM16A blockers T16Ainh‐A01 and benzbromarone do not modulate the regulation of sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation during whole‐body heat stress. Animal and in vitro studies suggest that transmembrane member 16A (TMEM16A), a Ca2+‐activated Cl− channel, contributes to regulating eccrine sweating. However, direct evidence supporting this possibility in humans is lacking. We assessed the hypothesis that TMEM16A blockers attenuate sweating during whole‐body heating in humans. Additionally, we assessed the associated changes in the heat loss response of cutaneous vasodilatation to determine if a functional role of TMEM16A may exist. Twelve young (24 ± 2 years) adults (six females) underwent whole‐body heating using a water‐perfused suit to raise core temperature 1.1 ± 0.1°C above baseline. Sweat rate and cutaneous vascular conductance (normalized to maximal conductance via administration of sodium nitroprusside) were evaluated continuously at four forearm skin sites treated continuously by intradermal microdialysis with (1) lactated Ringer's solution (control), (2) 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) serving as a vehicle control, or (3) TMEM16A blockers 1 mM T16Ainh‐A01 or 2 mM benzbromarone dissolved in 5% DMSO solution. All drugs were administered continuously via intradermal microdialysis. Whole‐body heating increased core temperature progressively and this was paralleled by an increase in sweat rate and cutaneous vascular conductance at all skin sites. However, sweat rate (all P > 0.318) and cutaneous vascular conductance (all P ≥ 0.073) did not differ between the vehicle control site relative to the TMEM16A blocker‐treated sites. Collectively, our findings indicate that TMEM16A blockers T16Ainh‐A01 and benzbromarone do not modulate the regulation of sweating and cutaneous vasodilatation during whole‐body heating in young adults in vivo.
ISSN:0958-0670
1469-445X
DOI:10.1113/EP090521