Blueprint for the ideal microplastic effect study: Critical issues of current experimental approaches and envisioning a path forward

This article presents a novel conceptual blueprint for an ‘ideal’, i.e., ecologically relevant, microplastic effect study. The blueprint considers how microplastics should be characterized and applied in laboratory experiments, and how biological responses should be measured to assure unbiased data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2022-09, Vol.838, p.156610-156610, Article 156610
Hauptverfasser: Kotta, Jonne, Lenz, Mark, Barboza, Francisco R., Jänes, Holger, Grande, Paula Aguilera Dal, Beck, Aaron, Van Colen, Carl, Hamm, Thea, Javidpour, Jamileh, Kaasik, Ants, Pantó, Gabriella, Szava-Kovats, Robert, Orav-Kotta, Helen, Lees, Liisi, Loite, Sander, Canning-Clode, João, Gueroun, Sonia K.M., Kõivupuu, Anneliis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This article presents a novel conceptual blueprint for an ‘ideal’, i.e., ecologically relevant, microplastic effect study. The blueprint considers how microplastics should be characterized and applied in laboratory experiments, and how biological responses should be measured to assure unbiased data that reliably reflect the effects of microplastics on aquatic biota. This ‘ideal’ experiment, although practically unachievable, serves as a backdrop to improve specific aspects of experimental research on microplastic effects. In addition, a systematic and quantitative literature review identified and quantified departures of published experiments from the proposed ‘ideal’ design. These departures are related mainly to the experimental design of microplastic effect studies failing to mimic natural environments, and experiments with limited potential to be scaled-up to ecosystem level. To produce a valid and generalizable assessment of the effect of microplastics on biota, a quantitative meta-analysis was performed that incorporated the departure of studies from the ‘ideal’ experiment (a measure of experimental quality) and inverse variance (a measure of the study precision) as weighting coefficients. Greater weights were assigned to experiments with higher quality and/or with lower variance in the response variables. This double-weighting captures jointly the technical quality, ecological relevance and precision of estimates provided in each study. The blueprint and associated meta-analysis provide an improved baseline for the design of ecologically relevant and technically sound experiments to understand the effects of microplastics on single species, populations and, ultimately, entire ecosystems. Conceptual blueprint for an ‘ideal’ microplastic effect study and associated meta-analysis to provide a better basis for the design of ecologically relevant and technically sound experiments with which to understand the effects of microplastics on single species, populations and, ultimately, entire ecosystems. [Display omitted] •Effects of microplastic on marine biota reflect the quality of experimental research.•The quality of published experiments can be quantified from an “ideal” experiment.•Previously published experiments have significantly deviated from “ideal”.•Implementation of proposed criteria can improve future microplastic experiments.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156610