Long-Term Evaluation of Endoscopic and Pretrichial Open Forehead Lifts: A Morphometric Analysis

BACKGROUNDThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the long-term (average, 6 years; range, 3 to 11 years) follow-up results of both the endoscopic and pretrichial open forehead lift. Both the amount of eyebrow elevation and patient satisfaction (FACE-Q questionnaires) were analyzed. METHODS...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2022-08, Vol.150 (2), p.289-298
Hauptverfasser: Aslan Gülbitti, Haydar, Stakelbeek, Charlotte, van der Lei, Berend
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDThe aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the long-term (average, 6 years; range, 3 to 11 years) follow-up results of both the endoscopic and pretrichial open forehead lift. Both the amount of eyebrow elevation and patient satisfaction (FACE-Q questionnaires) were analyzed. METHODSPreoperative and postoperative eyebrow positions of 65 patients were measured. Both eyebrow sides were measured at three different points. Thirty-two patients completed the FACE-Q questionnaires (10 domains, Dutch translation). RESULTSBoth the endoscopic and the pretrichial open forehead lift raised the eyebrow significantly at all measured points for each eye. This elevation effect was maintained significantly after long-term evaluation (average, 6 years; range 3 to 11 years), with no significant difference reported between techniques. After both procedures, patients were satisfied or strongly satisfied according to the FACE-Q questionnaires. CONCLUSIONBoth the endoscopic forehead lift and the pretrichial open forehead lift raise the eyebrow significantly, and both have a long-term effect with either satisfied or strongly satisfied patients, as evaluated according to the FACE-Q questionnaire. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCETherapeutic, III.
ISSN:0032-1052
1529-4242
DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000009366