The relationship of endometrial pathologies with endometrial thickness and inflammatory markers in breast cancers using tamoxifen
Purpose Some proliferative and neoplastic changes can be seen in the endometrium of breast cancers using tamoxifen adjuvant therapy (TMX-BC). Identifying risk groups is crucial, but methods and frequency of endometrial follow-up are still controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2023-02, Vol.307 (2), p.565-571 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Some proliferative and neoplastic changes can be seen in the endometrium of breast cancers using tamoxifen adjuvant therapy (TMX-BC). Identifying risk groups is crucial, but methods and frequency of endometrial follow-up are still controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinical, ultrasonographic, and inflammatory factors to differentiate pathological endometrium in TMX-BC.
Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed endometrial biopsy results of TMX-BC (
n
361). Normal endometrium (Group I,
n
237) and pathological endometrium (Group II,
n
124) were compared for clinical, ultrasonographic, and inflammatory features. Neutrophil and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (NLR; PLR), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), red blood cell distribution width (RDW), and lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (LMR) were the inflammatory markers.
Results
The majority of TMX-BC with endometrial biopsy were asymptomatic (72.6%) and had normal endometrium (65.7%). Pathologic endometrium included endometrial polyp (31.9%), endometrial hyperplasia (1.7%), and endometrial cancer (0.8%). The duration of tamoxifen, cancer stage, vaginal bleeding, and menopause was similar in Group I and Group II (
p
> 0.05). Group II had increased endometrial thickness (11.22 ± 5.44 mm) compared to Group I (8.51 ± 3.43 mm). Group II had higher RDW and PDW than Group I (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1432-0711 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00404-022-06608-y |