Recurrent glioblastoma: which treatment? A real-world study from the Neuro-oncology Unit “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute

Background The majority of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) experience disease progression. At recurrence, treatment options have limited efficacy. Many studies report a limited and short duration response rate. Although clinical trials represent the “gold standard” for providing evidence on efficacy of specific treatment strategies, real-world data can be considered more representative of the “real” GBM population. Objective To describe the management of GBM recurrence in a large real-world sample. Methods We analysed retrospectively the data stored in the database of the Neuro-oncology Unit, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. We considered only data of patients with histological diagnosis of GBM and disease recurrence during their follow-up. We excluded patients who did not receive treatment after the diagnosis. Results We analysed 422 patients (64% males, 36% females) with a mean age of 59.6 (range 16–87) years. At GBM recurrence, 135 (32.0%) patients underwent palliative care, and 287 (68.0%) underwent other treatments. Patients on palliative care were older, had a worse performance status, and a shorter time between GBM diagnosis and its recurrence. Patients who received chemotherapy in combination with other treatments (surgery and/or radiation therapy) at GBM recurrence had a longer survival than those in palliative care ( p