Long-term results of surgical ventricular reconstruction and comparison with the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure trial

The role of surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy is controversial. Observational series and the Surgical Treatment of IsChemic Heart failure (STICH) trial reported contradictory results. SVR is highly dependent on operator experience. The aim of this stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2024-02, Vol.167 (2), p.713-722.e7
Hauptverfasser: Gaudino, Mario, Castelvecchio, Serenella, Rahouma, Mohamed, Robinson, N. Bryce, Audisio, Katia, Soletti, Giovanni J., Cancelli, Gianmarco, Tam, Derrick Y., Garatti, Andrea, Benedetto, Umberto, Doenst, Torsten, Girardi, Leonard N., Michler, Robert E., Fremes, Stephen E., Velazquez, Eric J., Menicanti, Lorenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The role of surgical ventricular reconstruction (SVR) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy is controversial. Observational series and the Surgical Treatment of IsChemic Heart failure (STICH) trial reported contradictory results. SVR is highly dependent on operator experience. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term results of SVR between a high-volume SVR institution and the STICH trial using individual patient data. Patients undergoing SVR at San Donato Hospital (Milan) were compared with patients undergoing SVR in STICH (as-treated principle) by inverse probability treatment-weighted Cox regression. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The San Donato cohort included 725 patients, whereas the STICH cohort included 501. Compared with the STICH-SVR cohort, San Donato patients were older (66.0, lower quartile, upper quartile [Q1, Q3: 58.0, 72.0] vs 61.9 [Q1, Q3: 55.1, 68.8], P 
ISSN:0022-5223
1097-685X
1097-685X
DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.04.016