Survival after active surveillance versus upfront surgery for incidental small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

The safety of observing small non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-Pan-NETs) remains under debate. This was a multicentre retrospective study of patients with small incidental NF-Pan-NETs. Survival of patients who underwent upfront surgery versus active surveillance was compared. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of surgery 2022-07, Vol.109 (8), p.733-738
Hauptverfasser: Ricci, Claudio, Partelli, Stefano, Landoni, Luca, Rinzivillo, Maria, Ingaldi, Carlo, Andreasi, Valentina, Savegnago, Giulia, Muffatti, Francesca, Fontana, Michele, Tamburrino, Domenico, Deiro, Giacomo, Alberici, Laura, Campana, Davide, Panzuto, Francesco, Tuveri, Massimiliano, Bassi, Claudio, Salvia, Roberto, Falconi, Massimo, Casadei, Riccardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The safety of observing small non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-Pan-NETs) remains under debate. This was a multicentre retrospective study of patients with small incidental NF-Pan-NETs. Survival of patients who underwent upfront surgery versus active surveillance was compared. The risk of death was matched with that in the healthy population. The excess hazard rate and probability of a normal lifespan (NLP) were calculated. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1 : 1 ratio was used to minimize the risk of selection bias. Some 222 patients (43.7 per cent) underwent upfront surgery and 285 (56.3 per cent) were observed. The excess hazard rate for the entire cohort was quantifiable as 0.04 (95 per cent c.i. 0 to 0.08) deaths per 1000 persons per year, and the NLP was 99.7 per cent. Patients in the active surveillance group were older (median age 65 versus 58 years; P 
ISSN:1365-2168
DOI:10.1093/bjs/znac106