Prediction of Drug–Drug Interactions After Esketamine Intranasal Administration Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model

Background and Objective A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach for esketamine and its metabolite noresketamine after esketamine intranasal administration was developed to aid the prediction of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) during the clinical development of esketamine nasa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical pharmacokinetics 2022-08, Vol.61 (8), p.1115-1128
Hauptverfasser: Willemin, Marie-Emilie, Zannikos, Peter, Mannens, Geert, de Zwart, Loeckie, Snoeys, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objective A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach for esketamine and its metabolite noresketamine after esketamine intranasal administration was developed to aid the prediction of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) during the clinical development of esketamine nasal spray (SPRAVATO ® ). This article describes the development of the PBPK model to predict esketamine and noresketamine kinetics after intranasal administration of esketamine and its verification and application in the prediction of prospective DDIs with esketamine using models of index perpetrator and victim drugs. Methods The intranasal PBPK (IN-PBPK) models for esketamine/noresketamine were constructed in Simcyp ® v14.1 by combining the oral and intravenous esketamine PBPK models, with the dose divided in the ratio 57.7/42.3. Verification of the model was based on comparing the pharmacokinetics and DDI simulations with observed data in healthy volunteers. Results The simulated and observed (171 healthy volunteers) plasma pharmacokinetic profiles of intranasal esketamine/noresketamine showed a good match. The relative contributions of different cytochromes P450 (CYPs), mainly CYP3A4 and CYP2B6, involved in esketamine/noresketamine clearance was captured correctly in the IN-PBPK model using the DDI clinical studies of intranasal esketamine with clarithromycin and rifampicin and a published DDI study of oral esketamine with ticlopidine. The induction potential of esketamine toward CYP3A4 was also well captured. Inhibition of intranasal esketamine in the presence of ticlopidine was predicted to be not clinically relevant. Different scenarios tested with esketamine as a CYP3A4 perpetrator of midazolam also predicted the absence of clinically relevant CYP3A4 interactions. Conclusion This PBPK model of the intranasal route adequately described the pharmacokinetics and DDI of intranasal esketamine/noresketamine with potential perpetrator and victim drugs. This work was used to support regulatory submissions of SPRAVATO ® .
ISSN:0312-5963
1179-1926
DOI:10.1007/s40262-022-01123-4