The influence of methodology on the comparison of cytotoxicity of total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems
•Both, etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives, were cytotoxic under the standardized test.•Cell viability for self-etching adhesives was increased in the dentin-barrier model.•Clearfill SE Bond was identified as non-cytotoxic in the dentin-barrier model.•High levels of cytokines found after using...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 2022-07, Vol.122, p.104158-104158, Article 104158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Both, etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesives, were cytotoxic under the standardized test.•Cell viability for self-etching adhesives was increased in the dentin-barrier model.•Clearfill SE Bond was identified as non-cytotoxic in the dentin-barrier model.•High levels of cytokines found after using Adper Scotchbond, Optibond S and Single Bond Universal.
The present study aimed to compare the in vitro cytocompatibility of two etch-and-rinse (Adper Scothbond, Optibond) and two self-etch (Clearfill SE Bond and Single Bond Universal) dental adhesives through a dentin-barrier model with human pulp fibroblasts.
Human fibroblasts were placed on a plastic device containing 500μm human dentin discs treated with each adhesive or without treatment (control). Other groups were directly exposed to media conditioned with adhesive samples according to ISO 10993-5:2009. After 24h exposure, cell viability was assessed by XTT, and released inflammatory mediators were detected with a multiparametric immunoassay.
The standardized test without barrier indicated both etch-and-rinse adhesives and self-etch as cytotoxic, promoting viabilities under 70% of the control group (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104158 |