Intelligent and strong robust CVS-LVAD control based on soft-actor-critic algorithm

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an effective method to treat ventricular failure. According to the physiological conditions of different patients, the device adaptively adjusts its rotation speed to change LVAD output. In this study, a physiological control system for LVAD based on deep rei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Artificial intelligence in medicine 2022-06, Vol.128, p.102308-102308, Article 102308
Hauptverfasser: Li, Te, Cui, Wenbo, Xie, Nan, Li, Heng, Liu, Haibo, Li, Xu, Wang, Yongqing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an effective method to treat ventricular failure. According to the physiological conditions of different patients, the device adaptively adjusts its rotation speed to change LVAD output. In this study, a physiological control system for LVAD based on deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is proposed. The system estimates the amount of blood required by LVAD based on a Starling-like method. The DRL controller regulates LVAD to adjust the speed and quickly approach the target value. The changes of vascular resistance, myocardial contractility, and the transition from rest to exercise were simulated, and the single factor and mixed factor experiments were carried out to compare the effects of DRL controller and proportional integral derivative (PID) controller, which controls the system according to the difference between measured variables and expected values. Two metrics are used to illustrate the regulation effect: the sum of absolute error (SAE) and the response time of the two controllers, where SAE is the difference between the estimated required pumped blood flow LVADQe and the actual measured blood flow LVADQm. The experimental result shows that the SAE of the DRL controller is 47.6% of that of the PID controller, and the response time of the DRL controller is 38.6% of that of the PID controller. This study demonstrates that the LVAD based on the DRL controller can respond more quickly and more effectively to the different physiological needs of a variety of patients than a PID controller. •The traditional PID method cannot give consideration to robustness and response speed.•Using deep reinforcement learning to regulate the left ventricular assist device.•This method ensures the robustness and response speed of the controller.
ISSN:0933-3657
1873-2860
DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2022.102308