Whether verbal and visuospatial working memory play different roles in pupil’s mathematical abilities

Background Previous research showed a significant association between mathematics and working memory (WM). However, evidence regarding the different effects of verbal and visuospatial WM on mathematical abilities was very limited. Aims The current research aims to explore the relationship between ve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of educational psychology 2022-06, Vol.92 (2), p.e12454-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Zhanhong, Dong, Peiqi, Zhou, Yanlin, Feng, Shanshan, Zhang, Qiong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Previous research showed a significant association between mathematics and working memory (WM). However, evidence regarding the different effects of verbal and visuospatial WM on mathematical abilities was very limited. Aims The current research aims to explore the relationship between verbal and visuospatial WM with mathematical abilities, and how this relationship is moderated by age and math domains. We also wonder whether the results would change when we use several tests for each component and use a latent variable approach for more reliable measurement. Sample 131 first graders and 144 fifth graders from a primary school in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China, participated our research. Methods All participants completed three verbal and three visuospatial WM tasks, mathematics tests, and fluid intelligence test. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to examine the pattern of relations among these constructs. Results The results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that verbal WM significantly predicted mathematics achievement for fifth graders, while failed for first graders. However, visuospatial WM played a substantive role in both graders’ mathematical performance. The different role of the two WM components also depend on various fields of mathematics. Conclusion Our results indicated the distinct influence of verbal and visuospatial WM on primary school students’ mathematical abilities and highlighted the developmental and domain‐specific effects of WM on mathematics.
ISSN:0007-0998
2044-8279
DOI:10.1111/bjep.12454