The Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteomic Response to Traumatic and Nontraumatic Acute Brain Injury: A Prospective Study
Background Quantitative analysis of ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (vCSF) proteins following acute brain injury (ABI) may help identify pathophysiological pathways and potential biomarkers that can predict unfavorable outcome. Methods In this prospective proteomic analysis study, consecutive patien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurocritical care 2022-10, Vol.37 (2), p.463-470 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Quantitative analysis of ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (vCSF) proteins following acute brain injury (ABI) may help identify pathophysiological pathways and potential biomarkers that can predict unfavorable outcome.
Methods
In this prospective proteomic analysis study, consecutive patients with severe ABI expected to require intraventricular catheterization for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring for at least 5 days and patients without ABI admitted for elective clipping of an unruptured cerebral aneurysm were included. vCSF samples were collected within the first 24 h after ABI and ventriculostomy insertion and then every 24 h for 5 days. In patients without ABI, a single vCSF sample was collected at the time of elective clipping. Data-independent acquisition and sequential window acquisition of all theoretical spectra (SWATH) mass spectrometry were used to compare differences in protein expression in patients with ABI and patients without ABI and in patients with traumatic and nontraumatic ABI. Differences in protein expression according to different ICP values, intensive care unit outcome, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) versus traumatic brain injury (TBI), and good versus poor 3-month functional status (assessed by using the Glasgow Outcome Scale) were also evaluated. vCSF proteins with significant differences between groups were compared by using linear models and selected for gene ontology analysis using R Language and the Panther database.
Results
We included 50 patients with ABI (SAH
n
= 23, TBI
n
= 15, intracranial hemorrhage
n
= 6, ischemic stroke
n
= 3, others
n
= 3) and 12 patients without ABI. There were significant differences in the expression of 255 proteins between patients with and without ABI (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1541-6933 1556-0961 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12028-022-01507-1 |