Different approaches for ablation of RVOT-type arrhythmia: comparison between the choice of RVOT and pulmonary sinus cusp region for the first ablation attempt

Background This study aimed (1) to explore the electrophysiological characteristics of the bipolar and unipolar electrograms of ablation targets for RVOT arrhythmias with different ablation methods and to access the clinical outcome with different ablation strategies. Methods A consecutive series of 106 patients with RVOT arrhythmias who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) were studied. Conventional ablation method for RVOT targets and reverse U-curve technique for PSC targets were respectively used with different mapping outcomes. The electrophysiological characteristics of the bipolar and unipolar electrograms for ablation targets and clinical ablation outcome with different ablation strategies were evaluated. Results When there was an obvious difference (≥ 3 ms) of earliest targets (ETs) between the PSC and RVOT regions, conventional ablation technique in the RVOT region can achieve the same and high success rate compared with the reverse-U ablation technique in the PSC region as we choose the region with a better ET for first ablation attempt. When similar (< 3 ms) ETs were observed in the PSC and RVOT regions, ablation in the PSC region can achieve an apparently higher success rate compared with ablation in the RVOT region. ETs in the PSC region had a different pattern of bipolar potential compared with those in the RVOT region, as a discrete sharp near-field potential or a fractionated potential with low voltage was more frequently observed in the PSC region. Conclusions Different mapping outcomes led to different success rate with two ablation strategies. When similar ETs were observed in the PSC and RVOT regions, ablation in the PSC region could achieve an apparently higher success rate. A discrete sharp or fractionated potential could help to identify the sites of PVCs’ origination.