Patient-Therapist Expectancy Convergence and Outcome in Naturalistic Psychotherapy

Research on close relationships demonstrates that dyadic convergence, or two people becoming more similar in their experiences and/or beliefs over time, is commonplace and adaptive. As psychotherapy involves a close relationship, patient-therapist convergence processes may influence treatment-specif...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychotherapy (Chicago, Ill.) Ill.), 2022-12, Vol.59 (4), p.584-593
Hauptverfasser: Gaines, Averi N., Constantino, Michael J., Coyne, Alice E., Boswell, James F., Kraus, David R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Research on close relationships demonstrates that dyadic convergence, or two people becoming more similar in their experiences and/or beliefs over time, is commonplace and adaptive. As psychotherapy involves a close relationship, patient-therapist convergence processes may influence treatment-specific outcomes. Although prior research supports that patients and therapists tend to converge on their alliance perspectives over time, which associates with subsequent patient improvement, no research has similarly examined belief convergence during therapy. Accordingly, this study focused on patient-therapist convergence in their outcome expectations (OE), a belief variable associated with patient improvement when measured from individual participant perspectives. We predicted both that significant OE convergence would occur and relate to better posttreatment outcome. Data derived from a trial of naturalistic psychotherapy. Patients and therapists repeatedly rated their respective OE through treatment, and patients rated their symptom/functional outcomes at posttreatment. For dyads with the requisite OE data (N = 154), we tested our questions using multilevel structural equation modeling. Counter to our hypotheses, there was no discernable OE convergence pattern over treatment (γ100 = 0.01, SE = 0.03, p = .690) and OE convergence was unrelated to outcome at the between-dyad level (γ020 = 2.37, SE = 10.28, p = .818). However, on its own, higher early patient OE was significantly associated with better outcome at the between-dyad level (γ050 = −0.04, SE = 0.01, p = .007). Results suggest that OE may be more of a facilitative patient versus relational process factor. Clinical Impact Statement Question: This study tested the hypotheses that (a) patients and therapists would converge over time on their respective expectation for the patient's improvement (i.e., outcome expectation) and (b) such a relational process would relate to better actual posttreatment outcome. Findings: Although neither hypothesis was supported, more positive early patient outcome expectation (OE) on its own related to better posttreatment symptoms and functioning. Meaning: The results underscore the relative importance of therapists measuring and trying to cultivate a patient's early OE over attending to their own OE for a given patient (either in isolation or in relation to the patient's beliefs). Next Steps: Future work should replicate these findings in varied contexts with more diverse po
ISSN:0033-3204
1939-1536
DOI:10.1037/pst0000437