Attentional Bias in Non–Smoking Electronic Cigarette Users: An Eye-Tracking Study
Abstract Introduction This study examined attentional bias (AB) to e-cigarette cues among a sample of non–smoking daily e-cigarette users (n = 27), non–smoking occasional e-cigarette users (n = 32), and control participants (n = 61) who did not smoke or use e-cigarettes. The possibility that e-cigar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nicotine & tobacco research 2022-08, Vol.24 (9), p.1439-1447 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Introduction
This study examined attentional bias (AB) to e-cigarette cues among a sample of non–smoking daily e-cigarette users (n = 27), non–smoking occasional e-cigarette users (n = 32), and control participants (n = 61) who did not smoke or use e-cigarettes. The possibility that e-cigarette users develop a transference of cues to traditional cigarettes was also examined.
Methods
AB was assessed using a free-viewing eye-gaze tracking methodology, in which participants viewed 180 pairs of images for 4 seconds (e-cigarette and neutral image, e-cigarette and smoking image, smoking and neutral image).
Results
Daily and occasional e-cigarette users attended to pairs of e-cigarette and neutral images equally, whereas non–users attended to neutral images significantly more than e-cigarette images. All three groups attended to e-cigarette images significantly more than smoking images, with significantly larger biases for e-cigarette users. There were no between-group differences in attention to pairs of smoking and neutral images. A moderation analysis indicated that for occasional users but not daily users, years of vaping reduced the bias toward neutral images over smoking images.
Conclusions
Taken together, the results indicate that the e-cigarette users exhibit heightened attention to e-cigarettes relative to non–users, which may have implications as to how they react to e-cigarette cues in real-world settings. AB for e-cigarettes did not transfer to traditional cigarette cues, which indicates that further research is required to identify the mechanisms involved in the migration of e-cigarettes to traditional cigarettes.
Implications
This study is the first attempt to examine attentional biases for e-cigarette cues among non–smoking current e-cigarette users using eye-gaze tracking. The results contribute to the growing literature on the correlates of problematic e-cigarette use and indicate that daily and occasional e-cigarette use is associated with attentional biases for e-cigarettes. The existence of attentional biases in e-cigarette users may help to explain the high rate of failure to quit e-cigarettes and provides support for the utility of attentional bias modification in the treatment of problematic e-cigarette use. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-994X 1469-994X |
DOI: | 10.1093/ntr/ntac112 |