The utility of a multi-orifice epidural catheter when using the “Spray-as-You-Go” technique for topical Airway Anesthesia during Flexible Bronchoscopy, a randomised trial
Background Lidocaine administered through the working channel of a flexible bronchoscope can provide effective local anesthesia but cannot achieve good distribution in the airway. This study was undertaken to determine whether lidocaine delivered via a multi-orifice epidural catheter (three orifices...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2023-02, Vol.37 (1), p.55-62 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Lidocaine administered through the working channel of a flexible bronchoscope can provide effective local anesthesia but cannot achieve good distribution in the airway. This study was undertaken to determine whether lidocaine delivered via a multi-orifice epidural catheter (three orifices/openings) is superior to conventional method and if a better distribution and decreased the cough reflex can be achieved.
Methods
The patients (N = 100; 50 in each group) were randomized to receive either topical airway anesthesia by the “spray-as-you-go” technique via conventional application (group C) through the working channel of the bronchoscope or via a triple-orifice epidural catheter (group E). The primary outcome measurement was the cough severity, which was documented using a 4-point scale. Bronchoscopists and nurses assessed the coughing. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score for cough, total consumption of propofol and lidocaine, requirement frequency of propofol and topical anesthesia, PACU retention time, and adverse events were also compared.
Results
There was a significant difference in the median cough severity scores between the two groups (group C: 3 vs. group E: 2,
P
= 0.004). The median visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for the cough, were significantly higher in group C than those in group E (bronchoscopist: 3 vs. 2
P
= 0.002; nurse: 3 vs. 2,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1387-1307 1573-2614 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10877-022-00856-8 |