The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize “Feeling Better” or “Feeling Good” After Total Knee Arthroplasty?

The use of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds for patient selection in arthroplasty care has been questioned recently. This study aimed to identify factors affecting achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2022-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1751-1758
Hauptverfasser: Goh, Graham S., Baker, Colin M., Tarabichi, Saad, Clark, Sean C., Austin, Matthew S., Lonner, Jess H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1758
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1751
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 37
creator Goh, Graham S.
Baker, Colin M.
Tarabichi, Saad
Clark, Sean C.
Austin, Matthew S.
Lonner, Jess H.
description The use of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds for patient selection in arthroplasty care has been questioned recently. This study aimed to identify factors affecting achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine the overlap between the two outcomes. We identified 1,239 primary, unilateral TKAs performed at a single institution in 2015-2019. PROMs including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The likelihood of attaining PASS as per attainment of MCID was assessed. A multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of MCID and PASS. In total, 71.3% achieved MCID and 75.5% achieved PASS for KOOS-JR. Only 7.7% achieved MCID but not PASS, whereas almost twice this number did not achieve MCID but did achieve PASS (11.9%). Poorer preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 0.925), better SF-12 physical (OR 1.025), and mental (OR 1.027) were associated with MCID attainment. In contrast, better preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 1.030) and SF-12 mental (OR 1.025) were associated with PASS attainment. Age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, Charlson index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and smoking status were not significant predictors. Preoperative PROMs were associated with achieving MCID and PASS after TKA, albeit some positively and some negatively. In the era of value-based care, clinicians should not only strive to help patients “feel better” but also ensure that patients “feel good” after surgery. This study does not support the use of PROMs in prioritizing access to care.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652584219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540322004454</els_id><sourcerecordid>2652584219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e3a307dbfd0d4ca136981f1bbdb1c4a1e72671fe7e14508ce13de9a063d17d243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuOEzEQtBCIDQs_wAH5yGUGtx8zE4SEwopdEIsWQRBHy2P3EEeTONgexHLaT-AD4Of2S3CUBXHi1K3uqpKqipCHwGpg0DxZ1ybmVc0Z5zWTNYP2FpmBErzqJGtukxnrOlEpycQRuZfSmjEApeRdciSUFI3i3Yz8WK6QvjPRuPCNhqGs2eM2V-9xF2JGRy-mbMMG6Vs0aYqYntIPqzCNjn4qvOhD9Nl_R3p99fMUcfTbz_QF5ozx-uoXDfHf-1kIbn9dDOVNlyGbkb7ZItJFcRHDbjQpXz6_T-4MZkz44GYek4-nL5cnr6rzi7PXJ4vzygrV5AqFEax1_eCYk9aAaOYdDND3rgcrDWDLmxYGbBGkYp1FEA7nhjXCQeu4FMfk8UF3F8OXCVPWG58sjqPZYpiS5iUf1UkO8wLlB6iNIaWIg95FvzHxUgPT-yb0Wu-b0PsmNJO6NFFIj270p36D7i_lT_QF8OwAwOLyq8eoky3RW3Q-os3aBf8__d_d4J9a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652584219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize “Feeling Better” or “Feeling Good” After Total Knee Arthroplasty?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Goh, Graham S. ; Baker, Colin M. ; Tarabichi, Saad ; Clark, Sean C. ; Austin, Matthew S. ; Lonner, Jess H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goh, Graham S. ; Baker, Colin M. ; Tarabichi, Saad ; Clark, Sean C. ; Austin, Matthew S. ; Lonner, Jess H.</creatorcontrib><description>The use of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds for patient selection in arthroplasty care has been questioned recently. This study aimed to identify factors affecting achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine the overlap between the two outcomes. We identified 1,239 primary, unilateral TKAs performed at a single institution in 2015-2019. PROMs including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The likelihood of attaining PASS as per attainment of MCID was assessed. A multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of MCID and PASS. In total, 71.3% achieved MCID and 75.5% achieved PASS for KOOS-JR. Only 7.7% achieved MCID but not PASS, whereas almost twice this number did not achieve MCID but did achieve PASS (11.9%). Poorer preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 0.925), better SF-12 physical (OR 1.025), and mental (OR 1.027) were associated with MCID attainment. In contrast, better preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 1.030) and SF-12 mental (OR 1.025) were associated with PASS attainment. Age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, Charlson index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and smoking status were not significant predictors. Preoperative PROMs were associated with achieving MCID and PASS after TKA, albeit some positively and some negatively. In the era of value-based care, clinicians should not only strive to help patients “feel better” but also ensure that patients “feel good” after surgery. This study does not support the use of PROMs in prioritizing access to care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35436528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>acceptable symptom state ; clinically important difference ; knee arthroplasty ; patient-reported outcomes ; prior authorization ; value-based care</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2022-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1751-1758</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e3a307dbfd0d4ca136981f1bbdb1c4a1e72671fe7e14508ce13de9a063d17d243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e3a307dbfd0d4ca136981f1bbdb1c4a1e72671fe7e14508ce13de9a063d17d243</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3053-3900 ; 0000-0003-2333-1788</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540322004454$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goh, Graham S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarabichi, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Sean C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lonner, Jess H.</creatorcontrib><title>The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize “Feeling Better” or “Feeling Good” After Total Knee Arthroplasty?</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>The use of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds for patient selection in arthroplasty care has been questioned recently. This study aimed to identify factors affecting achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine the overlap between the two outcomes. We identified 1,239 primary, unilateral TKAs performed at a single institution in 2015-2019. PROMs including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The likelihood of attaining PASS as per attainment of MCID was assessed. A multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of MCID and PASS. In total, 71.3% achieved MCID and 75.5% achieved PASS for KOOS-JR. Only 7.7% achieved MCID but not PASS, whereas almost twice this number did not achieve MCID but did achieve PASS (11.9%). Poorer preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 0.925), better SF-12 physical (OR 1.025), and mental (OR 1.027) were associated with MCID attainment. In contrast, better preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 1.030) and SF-12 mental (OR 1.025) were associated with PASS attainment. Age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, Charlson index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and smoking status were not significant predictors. Preoperative PROMs were associated with achieving MCID and PASS after TKA, albeit some positively and some negatively. In the era of value-based care, clinicians should not only strive to help patients “feel better” but also ensure that patients “feel good” after surgery. This study does not support the use of PROMs in prioritizing access to care.</description><subject>acceptable symptom state</subject><subject>clinically important difference</subject><subject>knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>patient-reported outcomes</subject><subject>prior authorization</subject><subject>value-based care</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UcuOEzEQtBCIDQs_wAH5yGUGtx8zE4SEwopdEIsWQRBHy2P3EEeTONgexHLaT-AD4Of2S3CUBXHi1K3uqpKqipCHwGpg0DxZ1ybmVc0Z5zWTNYP2FpmBErzqJGtukxnrOlEpycQRuZfSmjEApeRdciSUFI3i3Yz8WK6QvjPRuPCNhqGs2eM2V-9xF2JGRy-mbMMG6Vs0aYqYntIPqzCNjn4qvOhD9Nl_R3p99fMUcfTbz_QF5ozx-uoXDfHf-1kIbn9dDOVNlyGbkb7ZItJFcRHDbjQpXz6_T-4MZkz44GYek4-nL5cnr6rzi7PXJ4vzygrV5AqFEax1_eCYk9aAaOYdDND3rgcrDWDLmxYGbBGkYp1FEA7nhjXCQeu4FMfk8UF3F8OXCVPWG58sjqPZYpiS5iUf1UkO8wLlB6iNIaWIg95FvzHxUgPT-yb0Wu-b0PsmNJO6NFFIj270p36D7i_lT_QF8OwAwOLyq8eoky3RW3Q-os3aBf8__d_d4J9a</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Goh, Graham S.</creator><creator>Baker, Colin M.</creator><creator>Tarabichi, Saad</creator><creator>Clark, Sean C.</creator><creator>Austin, Matthew S.</creator><creator>Lonner, Jess H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-3900</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2333-1788</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize “Feeling Better” or “Feeling Good” After Total Knee Arthroplasty?</title><author>Goh, Graham S. ; Baker, Colin M. ; Tarabichi, Saad ; Clark, Sean C. ; Austin, Matthew S. ; Lonner, Jess H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e3a307dbfd0d4ca136981f1bbdb1c4a1e72671fe7e14508ce13de9a063d17d243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>acceptable symptom state</topic><topic>clinically important difference</topic><topic>knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>patient-reported outcomes</topic><topic>prior authorization</topic><topic>value-based care</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goh, Graham S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Colin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarabichi, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Sean C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lonner, Jess H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goh, Graham S.</au><au>Baker, Colin M.</au><au>Tarabichi, Saad</au><au>Clark, Sean C.</au><au>Austin, Matthew S.</au><au>Lonner, Jess H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize “Feeling Better” or “Feeling Good” After Total Knee Arthroplasty?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1751</spage><epage>1758</epage><pages>1751-1758</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>The use of preoperative patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) thresholds for patient selection in arthroplasty care has been questioned recently. This study aimed to identify factors affecting achievement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and determine the overlap between the two outcomes. We identified 1,239 primary, unilateral TKAs performed at a single institution in 2015-2019. PROMs including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The likelihood of attaining PASS as per attainment of MCID was assessed. A multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of MCID and PASS. In total, 71.3% achieved MCID and 75.5% achieved PASS for KOOS-JR. Only 7.7% achieved MCID but not PASS, whereas almost twice this number did not achieve MCID but did achieve PASS (11.9%). Poorer preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 0.925), better SF-12 physical (OR 1.025), and mental (OR 1.027) were associated with MCID attainment. In contrast, better preoperative KOOS-JR (OR 1.030) and SF-12 mental (OR 1.025) were associated with PASS attainment. Age, gender, race, ethnicity, body mass index, Charlson index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and smoking status were not significant predictors. Preoperative PROMs were associated with achieving MCID and PASS after TKA, albeit some positively and some negatively. In the era of value-based care, clinicians should not only strive to help patients “feel better” but also ensure that patients “feel good” after surgery. This study does not support the use of PROMs in prioritizing access to care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35436528</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.017</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3053-3900</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2333-1788</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2022-09, Vol.37 (9), p.1751-1758
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2652584219
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects acceptable symptom state
clinically important difference
knee arthroplasty
patient-reported outcomes
prior authorization
value-based care
title The Paradox of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Should We Prioritize “Feeling Better” or “Feeling Good” After Total Knee Arthroplasty?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T04%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Paradox%20of%20Patient-Reported%20Outcome%20Measures:%20Should%20We%20Prioritize%20%E2%80%9CFeeling%20Better%E2%80%9D%20or%20%E2%80%9CFeeling%20Good%E2%80%9D%20After%20Total%20Knee%20Arthroplasty?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Goh,%20Graham%20S.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1751&rft.epage=1758&rft.pages=1751-1758&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2652584219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652584219&rft_id=info:pmid/35436528&rft_els_id=S0883540322004454&rfr_iscdi=true