Atrial fibrillation signatures on intracardiac electrograms identified by deep learning

Automatic detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) by cardiac devices is increasingly common yet suboptimally groups AF, flutter or tachycardia (AT) together as ‘high rate events’. This may delay or misdirect therapy. We hypothesized that deep learning (DL) can accurately classify AF from AT by reveali...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers in biology and medicine 2022-06, Vol.145, p.105451-105451, Article 105451
Hauptverfasser: Rodrigo, Miguel, Alhusseini, Mahmood I., Rogers, Albert J., Krittanawong, Chayakrit, Thakur, Sumiran, Feng, Ruibin, Ganesan, Prasanth, Narayan, Sanjiv M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Automatic detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) by cardiac devices is increasingly common yet suboptimally groups AF, flutter or tachycardia (AT) together as ‘high rate events’. This may delay or misdirect therapy. We hypothesized that deep learning (DL) can accurately classify AF from AT by revealing electrogram (EGM) signatures. We studied 86 patients in whom the diagnosis of AF or AT was established at electrophysiological study (25 female, 65 ± 11 years). Custom DL architectures were trained to identify AF using N = 29,340 unipolar and N = 23,760 bipolar EGM segments. We compared DL to traditional classifiers based on rate or regularity. We explained DL using computer models to assess the impact of controlled variations in shape, rate and timing on AF/AT classification in 246,067 EGMs reconstructed from clinical data. DL identified AF with AUC of 0.97 ± 0.04 (unipolar) and 0.92 ± 0.09 (bipolar). Rule-based classifiers misclassified ∼10–12% of cases. DL classification was explained by regularity in EGM shape (13%) or timing (26%), and rate (60%; p 15% timing variation,
ISSN:0010-4825
1879-0534
DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105451