What is “Value”? Results of a Survey of Cancer Patients and Providers

Background We measured the importance patients with gastrointestinal cancer and health care providers place on treatment outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Methods This cross-sectional survey study was conducted between June 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. We identified surviving patients who had...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgical oncology 2022-10, Vol.29 (11), p.6537-6545
Hauptverfasser: Allen, Casey J., Smith, Grace L., Prakash, Laura, Volk, Robert J., Ikoma, Naruhiko, Aloia, Thomas A., Gottumukkala, Vijaya, Katz, Matthew H. G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background We measured the importance patients with gastrointestinal cancer and health care providers place on treatment outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Methods This cross-sectional survey study was conducted between June 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. We identified surviving patients who had been treated or were anticipating treatment for pancreatic or gastric cancer at our single institution from January 1, 2000 through January 31, 2020. Surveys assessed the importance patients and providers placed on outcomes, well-being, costs, and experiences. Surveys measured how these values had changed over time. We compared the importance patients and providers place on each of the attributes of value. Results A total of 383 patients and 164 providers responded. Providers felt experience, emotional well-being, and costs were more important than patients themselves did (all p < 0.05). Patients more commonly reported that survival had become more important to them over time, while providers believed that emotional well-being, experience, and costs had become more important to patients (all p < 0.05). Postoperative patients ranked functional well-being as more important than preoperative patients did ( p = 0.031). Patients of lower income and education levels more reported concerns of costs over the course of their care (both p < 0.05). Younger age was associated with concern for direct (r = −0.167, p = 0.004) and indirect costs (r = −0.318, p < 0.001). Conclusions Although there are consistencies amongst the views of cancer patients and providers, there remain discordances in the perception of value. Patients’ values differed across their treatment and survivorship course. These data demonstrate the importance of accounting for multistakeholder perspectives in assessments of value in health care.
ISSN:1068-9265
1534-4681
DOI:10.1245/s10434-022-11534-z