Physician Identification Badges: A Multispecialty Quality Improvement Study to Address Professional Misidentification and Bias

To evaluate whether providing resident physicians with “DOCTOR” role identification badges would impact perceptions of bias in the workforce and alter misidentification rates. Between October 2019 and December 2019, we surveyed 341 resident physicians in the anesthesiology, dermatology, internal med...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mayo Clinic proceedings 2022-04, Vol.97 (4), p.658-667
Hauptverfasser: Olson, Emily M., Dines, Virginia A., Ryan, Samantha M., Halvorsen, Andrew J., Long, Timothy R., Price, Daniel L., Thompson, R. Houston, Tollefson, Megha M., Van Gompel, Jamie J., Oxentenko, Amy S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate whether providing resident physicians with “DOCTOR” role identification badges would impact perceptions of bias in the workforce and alter misidentification rates. Between October 2019 and December 2019, we surveyed 341 resident physicians in the anesthesiology, dermatology, internal medicine, neurologic surgery, otorhinolaryngology, and urology departments at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, before and after an 8-week intervention of providing “DOCTOR” role identification badges. Differences between paired preintervention and postintervention survey answers were measured, with a focus on the frequency of experiencing perceived bias and role misidentification (significance level, α=.01). Free-text comments were also compared. Of the 159 residents who returned both the before and after surveys (survey response rate, 46.6% [159 of 341]), 128 (80.5%) wore the “DOCTOR” badge. After the intervention, residents who wore the badges were statistically significantly less likely to report role misidentification at least once a week from patients, nonphysician team members, and other physicians (50.8% [65] preintervention vs 10.2% [13] postintervention; 35.9% [46] vs 8.6% [11]; 18.0% [23] vs 3.9% [5], respectively; all P
ISSN:0025-6196
1942-5546
DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.01.007