Efficacy and safety exposure–response relationships of apalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: results from the phase 3 TITAN study

Purpose Apalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been approved for treatment of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) based on data from phase 3 TITAN study. This analysis was conducted to describe pharmacokinetics of apalutamide and N -desmethyl-apalut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2022-05, Vol.89 (5), p.629-641
Hauptverfasser: T’jollyn, Huybrecht, Ackaert, Oliver, Chien, Caly, Lopez-Gitlitz, Angela, McCarthy, Sharon, Ruixo, Carlos Perez, Karsh, Lawrence, Chi, Kim, Chowdhury, Simon, Ruixo, Juan-Jose Perez, Agarwal, Neeraj
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Apalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) has been approved for treatment of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) based on data from phase 3 TITAN study. This analysis was conducted to describe pharmacokinetics of apalutamide and N -desmethyl-apalutamide and explore relationships between apalutamide exposure and selected clinical efficacy and safety observations. Methods 1052 patients were randomized to apalutamide + ADT ( n  = 525) or placebo + ADT ( n  = 527). A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model was applied. Cox regression analysis investigated the relationships between apalutamide exposure and overall survival (OS; n  = 1004) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; n  = 1003). Logistic regression analysis assessed the relationships between apalutamide exposure and selected clinically relevant adverse events ( n  = 1051). Results Apalutamide + ADT treatment was efficacious in extending rPFS and OS versus placebo + ADT. Within a relatively narrow apalutamide exposure range (coefficient of variation: 22%), no statistical association was detected between rPFS, OS and apalutamide exposure quartiles. Incidence of skin rash and pruritus increased significantly with increasing apalutamide exposure. Conclusions Differences in apalutamide exposure were not associated with clinically relevant differences in rPFS or OS in patients with mCSPC. Patients with increased apalutamide exposure are more likely to develop skin rash and pruritus. Dose reductions may improve these adverse events, based on an individual risk–benefit approach.
ISSN:0344-5704
1432-0843
DOI:10.1007/s00280-022-04427-1