Functional resistance training methods for targeting patient-specific gait deficits: A review of devices and their effects on muscle activation, neural control, and gait mechanics

Injuries to the neuromusculoskeletal system often result in weakness and gait impairments. Functional resistance training during walking—where patients walk while a device increases loading on the leg—is an emerging approach to combat these symptoms. However, there are many methods that can be used to resist the patient, which may alter the biomechanics of the training. Thus, all methods may not address patient-specific deficits. We performed a comprehensive electronic database search to identify articles that acutely (i.e., after a single training session) examined how functional resistance training during walking alters muscle activation, gait biomechanics, and neural plasticity. Only articles that examined these effects during training or following the removal of resistance (i.e., aftereffects) were included. We found 41 studies that matched these criteria. Most studies (24) used passive devices (e.g., weighted cuffs or resistance bands) while the remainder used robotic devices. Devices varied on if they were wearable (14) or externally tethered, and the type of resistance they applied (i.e., inertial [14], elastic [8], viscous [7], or customized [12]). Notably, these methods provided device-specific changes in muscle activation, biomechanics, and spatiotemporal and kinematic aftereffects. Some evidence suggests this training results in task-specific increases in neural excitability. These findings suggest that careful selection of resistive strategies could help target patient-specific strength deficits and gait impairments. Also, many approaches are low-cost and feasible for clinical or in-home use. The results provide new insights for clinicians on selecting an appropriate functional resistance training strategy to target patient-specific needs. •Functional resistance training during walking was applied using many devices.•Operation varied based on the device (e.g., robotic/passive and wearable/tethered).•These strategies varied in how they altered gait biomechanics and aftereffects.•Specific strategies can train patient-specific strength and gait deficits.•This training may also induce task-specific increases in neural excitability.