Long-lead seasonal forecast - where do we stand?
The performance of five ENSO prediction systems are examined: two are dynamical; one is a hybrid coupled model; and two are statistical. With increasing physical understanding, dynamically based forecasts have the potential to become more skillful than purely statistical ones. At a lead time of 6 mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 1994-01, Vol.75 (11), p.2097-2114 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The performance of five ENSO prediction systems are examined: two are dynamical; one is a hybrid coupled model; and two are statistical. With increasing physical understanding, dynamically based forecasts have the potential to become more skillful than purely statistical ones. At a lead time of 6 months, the SST forecasts have an overall correlation skill in the 0.60s for 1982-93, which easily outperforms persistence and is regarded as useful. Both types of forecasts are not much better than local higher-order autoregressive controls. However, continual progress is being made in understanding relations among global oceanic and atmospheric climate-scale anomaly fields. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-0007 |