Long-lead seasonal forecast - where do we stand?

The performance of five ENSO prediction systems are examined: two are dynamical; one is a hybrid coupled model; and two are statistical. With increasing physical understanding, dynamically based forecasts have the potential to become more skillful than purely statistical ones. At a lead time of 6 mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 1994-01, Vol.75 (11), p.2097-2114
Hauptverfasser: Barnston, Anthony G, van den Dool, Huug M, Zebiak, Stephen E, Barnett, Tim P, Ji, Ming, Rodenhuis, David R, Cane, Mark A, Leetmaa, Ants, Graham, Nicholas E, Ropelewski, Chester R, Kousky, Vernon E, O'Lenic, Edward A, Livezey, Robert E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The performance of five ENSO prediction systems are examined: two are dynamical; one is a hybrid coupled model; and two are statistical. With increasing physical understanding, dynamically based forecasts have the potential to become more skillful than purely statistical ones. At a lead time of 6 months, the SST forecasts have an overall correlation skill in the 0.60s for 1982-93, which easily outperforms persistence and is regarded as useful. Both types of forecasts are not much better than local higher-order autoregressive controls. However, continual progress is being made in understanding relations among global oceanic and atmospheric climate-scale anomaly fields.
ISSN:0003-0007