Real-world challenges in the management of acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center experience from North India

Background The outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in low-middle-income countries (LMIC) is dismal due to delayed clinical presentation and infection-related complications. We aimed to analyze the outcome of patients with AML and the factors associated with its prognosis. Methods A retrospective...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of hematology 2022-06, Vol.101 (6), p.1261-1273
Hauptverfasser: Chauhan, Priyanka, Gupta, Anshul, Gopinathan, M., Sanjeev, Garg, Akanksha, Khanna, Smriti, Gupta, Ruchi, Rahman, Khaliqur, Chandra, Dinesh, Singh, Manish Kumar, Nityanand, Soniya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in low-middle-income countries (LMIC) is dismal due to delayed clinical presentation and infection-related complications. We aimed to analyze the outcome of patients with AML and the factors associated with its prognosis. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care university hospital in North India from January 2015 to December 2019. Results A total of 137 AML patients (median age 32 year (3–66 years) received intensive chemotherapy during study period. The median delay from diagnosis to treatment was 45 days (6–177 days). Among the 352 febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes analyzed, 175 (49.7%) were culture positive; Gram-negative multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) sepsis during induction being 57.4% with 34.5% infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) leading to a mortality rate of 14.6%. The median EFS and OS were 12.0 ± 1.57 (95% CI 8.91–15.08) and 15.0 ± 2.44 (95% CI 10.21–19.78) months respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed significant difference in median OS between favorable vs high risk AML groups (20.0 (95% CI: 12.50–27.49) vs 9.0 (95% CI: 2.99–15.01) months; p  = 0.002); time from diagnosis to treatment (
ISSN:0939-5555
1432-0584
DOI:10.1007/s00277-022-04814-x