Effects of hypoxia and hyperoxia on venous capacity and compliance in healthy men and women

Blood oxygen is an important modulator of arterial function, but its impact on peripheral venous function is incompletely understood. Herein, we sought to determine the effect of hypoxia and hyperoxia on venous capacity and compliance in the lower limb. In 16 healthy individuals (7 women; age: 28.3 ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology integrative and comparative physiology, 2022-05, Vol.322 (5), p.R445-R453
Hauptverfasser: Fan, Jui-Lin, Sayegh, Ana Luiza C, Kaur, Manpreet, Dawes, Mathew, Paton, Julian F R, Fisher, James P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Blood oxygen is an important modulator of arterial function, but its impact on peripheral venous function is incompletely understood. Herein, we sought to determine the effect of hypoxia and hyperoxia on venous capacity and compliance in the lower limb. In 16 healthy individuals (7 women; age: 28.3 ± 7.6 yr, mean ± SD), we assessed peripheral oxygen saturation ([Formula: see text]), the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV; Doppler ultrasound), and calf volume (strain-gauge plethysmography) during a standard 60 mmHg thigh cuff inflation-deflation protocol. Separate trials were undertaken during breathing of room air, hypoxia [fraction in inspired oxygen ([Formula: see text]): 0.10], and hyperoxia ([Formula: see text]: 0.50), according to a single-blinded, randomized design. Lower limb pressure-CSA and pressure-volume relationships were modeled using a quadratic regression equation and compliance derived. [Formula: see text] was decreased by hypoxia (83.6 ± 5.6%) and increased by hyperoxia (98.7 ± 0.5%) compared with room air (96.4 ± 1.0%, < 0.001). Compared with room air (17.0 ± 7.9 mm ), hypoxia decreased GSV CSA (13.4 ± 5.7 mm , < 0.001), whereas no change was observed with hyperoxia (17.1 ± 8.7 mm , = 0.883). GSV compliance derived from the pressure-CSA relationships was elevated approximately twofold with hyperoxia (-0.0061 ± 0.0046 a.u.) when compared with room air (-0.0029 ± 0.002 a.u., = 0.027) and hypoxia (-0.0030 ± 0.0032 a.u., = 0.007). No differences were observed in calf pressure-volume parameters with either hypoxia or hyperoxia ( > 0.05). Our data indicate that GSV capacity is reduced by hypoxia, and that GSV compliance is increased by hyperoxia, thus highlighting the often overlooked role of oxygen in the regulation of venous circulation.
ISSN:0363-6119
1522-1490
DOI:10.1152/ajpregu.00319.2021