Psychometric validation of a patient‐reported experience measure of obstetric racism© (The PREM‐OB Scale™ suite)

Background Perinatal quality improvement lacks valid tools to measure adverse hospital experiences disproportionately impacting Black mothers and birthing people. Measuring and mitigating harm requires using a framework that centers the lived experiences of Black birthing people in evaluating inequi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 2022-09, Vol.49 (3), p.514-525
Hauptverfasser: White VanGompel, Emily, Lai, Jin‐Shei, Davis, Dána‐Ain, Carlock, Francesca, Camara, Tamentanefer L., Taylor, Brianne, Clary, Chakiya, McCorkle‐Jamieson, Ashlee M., McKenzie‐Sampson, Safyer, Gay, Caryl, Armijo, Amanda, Lapeyrolerie, Lillie, Singh, Lavisha, Scott, Karen A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Perinatal quality improvement lacks valid tools to measure adverse hospital experiences disproportionately impacting Black mothers and birthing people. Measuring and mitigating harm requires using a framework that centers the lived experiences of Black birthing people in evaluating inequitable care, namely, obstetric racism. We sought to develop a valid patient‐reported experience measure (PREM) of Obstetric Racism© in hospital‐based intrapartum care designed for, by, and with Black women as patient, community, and content experts. Methods PROMIS© instrument development standards adapted with cultural rigor methodology. Phase 1 included item pool generation, modified Delphi method, and cognitive interviews. Phase 2 evaluated the item pool using factor analysis and item response theory. Results Items were identified or written to cover 7 previously identified theoretical domains. 806 Black mothers and birthing people completed the pilot test. Factor analysis concluded a 3 factor structure with good fit indices (CFI = 0.931‐0.977, RMSEA = 0.087‐0.10, R2 > .3, residual correlation 
ISSN:0730-7659
1523-536X
DOI:10.1111/birt.12622