Stimulus intensity effects and sequential processing in the passive auditory ERP

Auditory stimulus intensity of innocuous tones is generally thought to have a direct effect on the amplitude of ERP components, but these effects have rarely been explored across a wide component range, or in multiple paradigms. Here we investigate component sensitivity to stimulus intensity differe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of psychophysiology 2022-06, Vol.176, p.149-163
Hauptverfasser: Barry, Robert J., De Blasio, Frances M., Rushby, Jacqueline A., MacDonald, Brett, Fogarty, Jack S., Cave, Adele E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Auditory stimulus intensity of innocuous tones is generally thought to have a direct effect on the amplitude of ERP components, but these effects have rarely been explored across a wide component range, or in multiple paradigms. Here we investigate component sensitivity to stimulus intensity differences in two studies. Study 1 (N = 36) employed a between-participants paradigm in which repeated trains of standard stimuli were presented as 50 or 80 dB SPL 1000 Hz tones. Study 2 (N = 18) used a within-participant presentation of alternating 60 and 80 dB SPL 1000 Hz tones. Electrode caps with 19 channels (referred to linked ears) generated ERPs covering the first 600 ms of each participant's EEG responses; these were submitted to separate temporal PCAs in each study. A similar series of components was obtained in each study: P1, N1a, N1b, N1c, P2, P3a, P3b, nP3, SW1, and SW2; an N2 was found in Study 2 only. Loud tones in Study 1 produced greater amplitudes in all components except SW1. In Study 2, Loud cf. Soft tones produced smaller P1 and nP3, larger N1 components, P2, and P3a, with no effect on N2, P3b, SW1 or SW2. These results indicate similar sequential processes underlying sensory processing in one- and two-stimulus paradigms, with the later stimulus intensity effects varying with paradigm. •We examined ERP components as a function of auditory intensity in 2 studies.•P1, N1a, N1b, N1c, P2, P3a, P3b, nP3, SW1, and SW2 occurred in each study.•All except SW1 increased with intensity in the between-subjects Study 1.•Intensity in Study 2 (within-subjects) increased only N1a, N1b, N1c, P2, P3a.•Results are related to sequential processing in 1- and 2-stimulus paradigms.
ISSN:0167-8760
1872-7697
DOI:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.03.005