Midterm Outcomes of One-Stage Hybrid Aortic Arch Repair for Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection: A Single Center's Experience

This study sought to identify the midterm outcomes of one-stage hybrid aortic arch repair (HAAR) in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD). Between January 2010 and December 2015, 75 consecutive patients with TAAD involving the aortic arch who underwent one-stage type Ⅱ HAAR at our institution were identified. During this period, 496 consecutive patients with TAAD underwent traditional total aortic arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk. The preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data of all patients were compared. A propensity score-matching analysis was applied to adjust for baseline risk factors. Five hundred and seventy-one patients were included for analysis (428 men; mean age, 48.9 ± 11.1 years). For all patients, the mean follow-up time was 41.1 ± 22.1 months, in-hospital mortality was 4.7%, and the 5-year survival rate was 89.5%. Midterm outcomes between the propensity-matched groups were compared (59 HAAR vs TAR pairs). HAAR group showed shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (105-159 minutes vs 158-230 minutes, P < 0.001), aortic cross-clamping time, postoperative ventilation time, and intensive care unit stays (33-108 hours vs 45-131 hours, P = 0.010) than the TAR group. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality, rate of stroke and rate of paraplegia between the 2 groups, however, better 5-year survival rate was found in HAAR group (94.9% vs 75.8%, Log-rank P = 0.005). As compared to propensity matched cohort of TAR patients, HAAR shows good midterm outcomes for patients with TAAD. Further randomized study was needed to clarify the optimal management strategy of TAAD. [Display omitted]