Is Modified Del Nido Cardioplegia as Effective as Del Nido Cardioplegia in Patients With Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery?

Is modified del Nido cardioplegia superior to del Nido cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass patients? All patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass and retrospectively were analyzed. A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Thirty-four patients who were given cold (+ 4-8C ') modifie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Heart surgery forum 2022-02, Vol.25 (1), p.E163-E167
Hauptverfasser: Karaarslan, Kemal, Erdinc, Ibrahim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Is modified del Nido cardioplegia superior to del Nido cardioplegia in coronary artery bypass patients? All patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass and retrospectively were analyzed. A total of 70 patients were included in the study. Thirty-four patients who were given cold (+ 4-8C ') modified del Nido cardioplegia antegrade were evaluated. Other patients received classical del Nido cardioplegia. Hot shot warm blood cardioplegia was given to all patients before the cross-clamp was removed. The results of both groups were compared. There was no significant difference between cardiac arrest times in both groups. A statistically significant difference was found in the modified del Nido cardioplegia group in the working of the heart. Less fibrillation was observed in the modified del Nido cardioplegia group. No difference found between the groups, regarding myocardial preservation. No decrease in hemoglobin was observed in the modified del Nido group on the postoperative first day. We know that return to spontaneous sinus rhythm and fibrillation reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury. At the same time, we can see that epicardial edema was less in the modified del Nido group. We think that less anemia is an advantage of modified del Nido cardioplegia.
ISSN:1098-3511
1522-6662
DOI:10.1532/hsf.4491