Split-bolus CT urography after microwave ablation of renal cell carcinoma improves image quality and reduces radiation exposure
Objective To compare image quality and radiation dose between single-bolus 2-phase and split-bolus 1-phase CT Urography (CTU) performed immediately after microwave ablation (MWA) of clinically localized T1 (cT1) RCC. Methods Forty-two consecutive patients (30 M, mean age 67.5 ± 9.0) with cT1 RCC wer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Abdominal imaging 2022-06, Vol.47 (6), p.2230-2237 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To compare image quality and radiation dose between single-bolus 2-phase and split-bolus 1-phase CT Urography (CTU) performed immediately after microwave ablation (MWA) of clinically localized T1 (cT1) RCC.
Methods
Forty-two consecutive patients (30 M, mean age 67.5 ± 9.0) with cT1 RCC were treated with MWA from 7/2013 to 12/2013 at two academic quaternary-care institutions. Renal parenchymal enhancement, collecting system opacification and distention and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were quantified and image quality subjectively assessed on single-bolus 2-phase versus split-bolus 1-phase CTU. Kruskal–Wallis and Pearson’s Chi-squared tests were performed to assess differences in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Two-sample
T
test with equal variances was used to determine differences in quantitative and qualitative image data.
Results
Median tumor diameter was larger [2.9 cm (IQR 1.7–5.3) vs 3.6 cm (IQR 1.7–5.7),
p
= 0.01] in the split-bolus cohort. Mean abdominal girth (
p
= 0.20) was similar. Number of antennas used and unenhanced CTs obtained before and during MWA were similar (
p
= 0.11–0.32). Renal pelvis opacification (2.5 vs 3.5,
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2366-0058 2366-004X 2366-0058 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00261-022-03448-x |