Measuring discomfort—An objective method for quantifying peak pressure discomfort and improved fit in adults with transtibial amputation

Background Prosthetic socket coupling with the residual limb should be comfortable without causing skin breakdown or excessive pressure. However, users report socket discomfort, and there is a scarcity of objective measurements available to assess this feeling of discomfort. Quantifying the specific...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PM & R 2023-04, Vol.15 (4), p.482-492
Hauptverfasser: Binedell, Trevor, Ghazali, Mohd Fazli Bin, Wong, Clara, Subburaj, Karupppasamy, Blessing, Lucienne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Prosthetic socket coupling with the residual limb should be comfortable without causing skin breakdown or excessive pressure. However, users report socket discomfort, and there is a scarcity of objective measurements available to assess this feeling of discomfort. Quantifying the specific pressure may enable clinicians and users to determine and improve comfort levels objectively. Objectives (1) To evaluate if a peak pressure reduction assists in resolving wounds, redness, and pain inside prosthetic sockets in people with transtibial amputation. (2) To determine if peak pressures measured inside the prosthetic socket due to external forces could be used to quantify the level of improvement in socket discomfort. Design In this cohort study, we used a pressure sensor to quantify and facilitate adjustments to the prosthetic socket, correlating this information to the userʼs socket comfort. Setting Outpatient clinic in a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Participants People (N = 16) with unilateral transtibial lower limb amputation using a prosthesis. Interventions NA. Main Outcome Measures Peak pressure and socket comfort score (SCS). Results The peak pressure value showed a statistically significant reduction across all participants following adjustments at a 50% delta change in pressure (p = .001). This was achieved with a mean number of 2.6 ± 1.4 adjustments per participant. Following the adjustments, the paired t‐test results showed a mean increase between the first SCS and final SCS was 2.6 (p = .001). Conclusion The wound, redness, and pain resolved in 15 of 16 participants regardless of diabetic status following socket adjustments. Although the peak pressures values did not correlate to the SCS score, the reduction in peak pressure saw significant improvement to the SCS. The use of a portable sensor is a fast and efficient means to quantify adjustments inside the prosthetic socket and could potentially be considered as part of future care delivery.
ISSN:1934-1482
1934-1563
DOI:10.1002/pmrj.12796