Comparison of long-term outcomes from rib fractures for patients undergoing both operative and non-operative management: a survey analysis

Introduction Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been gaining popularity for the treatment of rib fractures. Limited literature exists regarding the long-term effects of SSRF versus non-operative (NO) intervention. The goal of this study is to better understand these long-term effects...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2022-08, Vol.48 (4), p.3299-3304
Hauptverfasser: Bauman, Zachary Mitchel, Visenio, Michael, Patel, Megha, Sprigman, Connor, Raposo-Hadley, Ashley, Pieper, Collin, Holloway, Micah, Orcutt, Gunnar, Cemaj, Samuel, Evans, Charity, Cantrell, Emily
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) has been gaining popularity for the treatment of rib fractures. Limited literature exists regarding the long-term effects of SSRF versus non-operative (NO) intervention. The goal of this study is to better understand these long-term effects, hypothesizing SSRF patients have better outcomes. Methods IRB approved survey study at our Level I trauma center. Patients suffering rib fractures from 1/2017 through 1/2019 were surveyed via phone call and asked five questions. Basic demographics obtained. The five survey questions asked: “Are you still experiencing pain from your rib fractures?”; “If yes, how would you rate your pain 1–10?”; “Are you back to your baseline activity level?”; “If no, is this related to your rib fractures?”; “Do you feel your rib fractures moving/clicking?” Paired t test, Chi square, and median tests were utilized. Significance was set at p  
ISSN:1863-9933
1863-9941
DOI:10.1007/s00068-022-01900-7