Performers' Perceptions of Vocal Function During Oral Steroid Treatment of Vocal Fold Edema

Objectives Acute vocal fold edema (VFE) is often a consequence of illness, allergy, or voice overuse, causing dysphonia. Although VFE typically resolves with voice rest and treatment of predisposing causes, oral glucocorticoids are often considered for performers with imminent performance demands. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2022-12, Vol.132 (12), p.2434-2441
Hauptverfasser: Murphy Estes, Christine, Chadwick, Keith, Sadoughi, Babak, Andreadis, Katerina, Sussman, Scott, Sulica, Lucian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Acute vocal fold edema (VFE) is often a consequence of illness, allergy, or voice overuse, causing dysphonia. Although VFE typically resolves with voice rest and treatment of predisposing causes, oral glucocorticoids are often considered for performers with imminent performance demands. There are limited data about performers' perceptions of vocal change during treatment and how this relates to their ability to perform. This study aims to examine performers' self‐perceptions of vocal function with steroid treatment. Methods Fifty‐five performers (34 F; 21 M) diagnosed with VFE who chose treatment with a 6‐day methylprednisolone taper were prospectively assessed. They completed the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE) and reported on their voice use, regimen, performance obligations, and ability to perform. Findings were compared between Day 1 and Day 6 using paired t‐tests and nonparametric Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. Results Nearly all subjects completed scheduled performances without interruption. Following treatment, all subscales of the EASE were decreased at Day 6 (Vocal Function 29.78–20.59; Pathologic Risk Indicator 26.60–17.33; Vocal Concerns 6.10–4.20). These differences were statistically significant (p 
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.30072