Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation
Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive techno...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 148 |
---|---|
container_issue | Pt B |
container_start_page | 134 |
container_title | Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Koloda, Yulia Korsak, Vladislav Rozenson, Oleg Anshina, Margarita Sagamonova, Karina Baranov, Igor Yakovenko, Sergey D'Hooghe, Thomas Ershova, Anna Lispi, Monica |
description | Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.
•A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633855402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1521693422000189</els_id><sourcerecordid>2633855402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c962823acda9d7ebcea3fa7e110a63e90833e2c338666c017b45fa29570064213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhQMCMcPAijXIy5lFgh9N0nSDRiNKkSohAbO2HPumdeXYxY-i8utxpmWExILVteXvnKMrn6J4S3BFMGne76p-7_rN0VYUU1phUmHcPS0uSc1oSTpGn01nSsqmY7OL4mUIO4wZ62j9orhg-aHpcHv55M19AOQGJJAH6cZeW2Ej2qZRWDQ4Y7Q0UIaox2RE1HaDts6PzsLiX9ykCNrqX39R6NqX2-W31SKP9eoG0QVBZ1nUbkrw-W6jz0mgkDsIr7PTY15GVPKToQhBh5gZD3vvVJJRHwBFkFvrjNscUfQg4gg2LtBthoQpfzpvVPZK6jht6F3KCwDae5HFEpC2KG4BfU3ZOocuQYF_yHxVPB-ECfD6PK-K--XH73ercv3l0-e723UpZ4TGUnYNnVMmpBKdaqGXINggWiAEi4ZBh-eMAZWMzZumkZi0_aweBO3qFuNmRgm7Kq5PvnmjHwlC5KMOEowRFlwKnDZZW9czTDNan1DpXQgeBr73ehT-yAnmUx_4jp_7wKc-cEx47kPWvTtHpH4E9aj6U4AMfDgBkBc9aPA8SA1WgtL5hyNXTv8n4jcZWNC2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2633855402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.
•A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-6934</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-1932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35216907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Assisted reproductive technology ; Clinical practice ; Female ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - therapeutic use ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Luteinizing Hormone - therapeutic use ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; r-hFSH ; r-hLH ; Real-world data ; Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted ; Retrospective Studies ; Suboptimal/poor ovarian response</subject><ispartof>Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c962823acda9d7ebcea3fa7e110a63e90833e2c338666c017b45fa29570064213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c962823acda9d7ebcea3fa7e110a63e90833e2c338666c017b45fa29570064213</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2502-575X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsak, Vladislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenson, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anshina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagamonova, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakovenko, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ershova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><title>Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology</title><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.
•A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%.</description><subject>Assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Clinical practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luteinizing Hormone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>r-hFSH</subject><subject>r-hLH</subject><subject>Real-world data</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Suboptimal/poor ovarian response</subject><issn>1521-6934</issn><issn>1532-1932</issn><issn>1532-1932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhQMCMcPAijXIy5lFgh9N0nSDRiNKkSohAbO2HPumdeXYxY-i8utxpmWExILVteXvnKMrn6J4S3BFMGne76p-7_rN0VYUU1phUmHcPS0uSc1oSTpGn01nSsqmY7OL4mUIO4wZ62j9orhg-aHpcHv55M19AOQGJJAH6cZeW2Ej2qZRWDQ4Y7Q0UIaox2RE1HaDts6PzsLiX9ykCNrqX39R6NqX2-W31SKP9eoG0QVBZ1nUbkrw-W6jz0mgkDsIr7PTY15GVPKToQhBh5gZD3vvVJJRHwBFkFvrjNscUfQg4gg2LtBthoQpfzpvVPZK6jht6F3KCwDae5HFEpC2KG4BfU3ZOocuQYF_yHxVPB-ECfD6PK-K--XH73ercv3l0-e723UpZ4TGUnYNnVMmpBKdaqGXINggWiAEi4ZBh-eMAZWMzZumkZi0_aweBO3qFuNmRgm7Kq5PvnmjHwlC5KMOEowRFlwKnDZZW9czTDNan1DpXQgeBr73ehT-yAnmUx_4jp_7wKc-cEx47kPWvTtHpH4E9aj6U4AMfDgBkBc9aPA8SA1WgtL5hyNXTv8n4jcZWNC2</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Koloda, Yulia</creator><creator>Korsak, Vladislav</creator><creator>Rozenson, Oleg</creator><creator>Anshina, Margarita</creator><creator>Sagamonova, Karina</creator><creator>Baranov, Igor</creator><creator>Yakovenko, Sergey</creator><creator>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creator><creator>Ershova, Anna</creator><creator>Lispi, Monica</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-575X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><author>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c962823acda9d7ebcea3fa7e110a63e90833e2c338666c017b45fa29570064213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Clinical practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luteinizing Hormone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>r-hFSH</topic><topic>r-hLH</topic><topic>Real-world data</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Suboptimal/poor ovarian response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsak, Vladislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenson, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anshina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagamonova, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakovenko, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ershova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koloda, Yulia</au><au>Korsak, Vladislav</au><au>Rozenson, Oleg</au><au>Anshina, Margarita</au><au>Sagamonova, Karina</au><au>Baranov, Igor</au><au>Yakovenko, Sergey</au><au>D'Hooghe, Thomas</au><au>Ershova, Anna</au><au>Lispi, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</atitle><jtitle>Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>Pt B</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>134-148</pages><issn>1521-6934</issn><issn>1532-1932</issn><eissn>1532-1932</eissn><abstract>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation.
•A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35216907</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-575X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1521-6934 |
ispartof | Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148 |
issn | 1521-6934 1532-1932 1532-1932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633855402 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Assisted reproductive technology Clinical practice Female Follicle Stimulating Hormone - therapeutic use Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human - therapeutic use Humans Luteinizing Hormone - therapeutic use Ovulation Induction - methods Pregnancy Prospective Studies r-hFSH r-hLH Real-world data Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Retrospective Studies Suboptimal/poor ovarian response |
title | Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A46%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20a%20recombinant%20human%20follicle-stimulating%20hormone:recombinant%20human%20luteinizing%20hormone%20(r-hFSH:r-hLH)%202:1%20combination%20for%20controlled%20ovarian%20stimulation%20during%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20treatment:%20A%20real-world%20study%20of%20routine%20practice%20in%20the%20Russian%20Federation&rft.jtitle=Best%20practice%20&%20research.%20Clinical%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=Koloda,%20Yulia&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=Pt%20B&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=134-148&rft.issn=1521-6934&rft.eissn=1532-1932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2633855402%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2633855402&rft_id=info:pmid/35216907&rft_els_id=S1521693422000189&rfr_iscdi=true |