Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation

Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive techno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148
Hauptverfasser: Koloda, Yulia, Korsak, Vladislav, Rozenson, Oleg, Anshina, Margarita, Sagamonova, Karina, Baranov, Igor, Yakovenko, Sergey, D'Hooghe, Thomas, Ershova, Anna, Lispi, Monica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148
container_issue Pt B
container_start_page 134
container_title Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology
container_volume 85
creator Koloda, Yulia
Korsak, Vladislav
Rozenson, Oleg
Anshina, Margarita
Sagamonova, Karina
Baranov, Igor
Yakovenko, Sergey
D'Hooghe, Thomas
Ershova, Anna
Lispi, Monica
description Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation. •A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633855402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1521693422000189</els_id><sourcerecordid>2633855402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c962823acda9d7ebcea3fa7e110a63e90833e2c338666c017b45fa29570064213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhQMCMcPAijXIy5lFgh9N0nSDRiNKkSohAbO2HPumdeXYxY-i8utxpmWExILVteXvnKMrn6J4S3BFMGne76p-7_rN0VYUU1phUmHcPS0uSc1oSTpGn01nSsqmY7OL4mUIO4wZ62j9orhg-aHpcHv55M19AOQGJJAH6cZeW2Ej2qZRWDQ4Y7Q0UIaox2RE1HaDts6PzsLiX9ykCNrqX39R6NqX2-W31SKP9eoG0QVBZ1nUbkrw-W6jz0mgkDsIr7PTY15GVPKToQhBh5gZD3vvVJJRHwBFkFvrjNscUfQg4gg2LtBthoQpfzpvVPZK6jht6F3KCwDae5HFEpC2KG4BfU3ZOocuQYF_yHxVPB-ECfD6PK-K--XH73ercv3l0-e723UpZ4TGUnYNnVMmpBKdaqGXINggWiAEi4ZBh-eMAZWMzZumkZi0_aweBO3qFuNmRgm7Kq5PvnmjHwlC5KMOEowRFlwKnDZZW9czTDNan1DpXQgeBr73ehT-yAnmUx_4jp_7wKc-cEx47kPWvTtHpH4E9aj6U4AMfDgBkBc9aPA8SA1WgtL5hyNXTv8n4jcZWNC2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2633855402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</creator><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><description>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation. •A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-6934</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-1932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35216907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Assisted reproductive technology ; Clinical practice ; Female ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone - therapeutic use ; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Luteinizing Hormone - therapeutic use ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Pregnancy ; Prospective Studies ; r-hFSH ; r-hLH ; Real-world data ; Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted ; Retrospective Studies ; Suboptimal/poor ovarian response</subject><ispartof>Best practice &amp; research. Clinical obstetrics &amp; gynaecology, 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c962823acda9d7ebcea3fa7e110a63e90833e2c338666c017b45fa29570064213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c962823acda9d7ebcea3fa7e110a63e90833e2c338666c017b45fa29570064213</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2502-575X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35216907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsak, Vladislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenson, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anshina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagamonova, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakovenko, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ershova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><title>Best practice &amp; research. Clinical obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</title><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation. •A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%.</description><subject>Assisted reproductive technology</subject><subject>Clinical practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luteinizing Hormone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>r-hFSH</subject><subject>r-hLH</subject><subject>Real-world data</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Suboptimal/poor ovarian response</subject><issn>1521-6934</issn><issn>1532-1932</issn><issn>1532-1932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkkuP0zAUhQMCMcPAijXIy5lFgh9N0nSDRiNKkSohAbO2HPumdeXYxY-i8utxpmWExILVteXvnKMrn6J4S3BFMGne76p-7_rN0VYUU1phUmHcPS0uSc1oSTpGn01nSsqmY7OL4mUIO4wZ62j9orhg-aHpcHv55M19AOQGJJAH6cZeW2Ej2qZRWDQ4Y7Q0UIaox2RE1HaDts6PzsLiX9ykCNrqX39R6NqX2-W31SKP9eoG0QVBZ1nUbkrw-W6jz0mgkDsIr7PTY15GVPKToQhBh5gZD3vvVJJRHwBFkFvrjNscUfQg4gg2LtBthoQpfzpvVPZK6jht6F3KCwDae5HFEpC2KG4BfU3ZOocuQYF_yHxVPB-ECfD6PK-K--XH73ercv3l0-e723UpZ4TGUnYNnVMmpBKdaqGXINggWiAEi4ZBh-eMAZWMzZumkZi0_aweBO3qFuNmRgm7Kq5PvnmjHwlC5KMOEowRFlwKnDZZW9czTDNan1DpXQgeBr73ehT-yAnmUx_4jp_7wKc-cEx47kPWvTtHpH4E9aj6U4AMfDgBkBc9aPA8SA1WgtL5hyNXTv8n4jcZWNC2</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Koloda, Yulia</creator><creator>Korsak, Vladislav</creator><creator>Rozenson, Oleg</creator><creator>Anshina, Margarita</creator><creator>Sagamonova, Karina</creator><creator>Baranov, Igor</creator><creator>Yakovenko, Sergey</creator><creator>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creator><creator>Ershova, Anna</creator><creator>Lispi, Monica</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-575X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</title><author>Koloda, Yulia ; Korsak, Vladislav ; Rozenson, Oleg ; Anshina, Margarita ; Sagamonova, Karina ; Baranov, Igor ; Yakovenko, Sergey ; D'Hooghe, Thomas ; Ershova, Anna ; Lispi, Monica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-c962823acda9d7ebcea3fa7e110a63e90833e2c338666c017b45fa29570064213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Assisted reproductive technology</topic><topic>Clinical practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luteinizing Hormone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>r-hFSH</topic><topic>r-hLH</topic><topic>Real-world data</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Suboptimal/poor ovarian response</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koloda, Yulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korsak, Vladislav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozenson, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anshina, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagamonova, Karina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranov, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakovenko, Sergey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Hooghe, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ershova, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lispi, Monica</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Best practice &amp; research. Clinical obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koloda, Yulia</au><au>Korsak, Vladislav</au><au>Rozenson, Oleg</au><au>Anshina, Margarita</au><au>Sagamonova, Karina</au><au>Baranov, Igor</au><au>Yakovenko, Sergey</au><au>D'Hooghe, Thomas</au><au>Ershova, Anna</au><au>Lispi, Monica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation</atitle><jtitle>Best practice &amp; research. Clinical obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>Pt B</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>134-148</pages><issn>1521-6934</issn><issn>1532-1932</issn><eissn>1532-1932</eissn><abstract>Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation. •A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35216907</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2502-575X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1521-6934
ispartof Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148
issn 1521-6934
1532-1932
1532-1932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2633855402
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Assisted reproductive technology
Clinical practice
Female
Follicle Stimulating Hormone - therapeutic use
Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human - therapeutic use
Humans
Luteinizing Hormone - therapeutic use
Ovulation Induction - methods
Pregnancy
Prospective Studies
r-hFSH
r-hLH
Real-world data
Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Retrospective Studies
Suboptimal/poor ovarian response
title Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T09%3A46%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20a%20recombinant%20human%20follicle-stimulating%20hormone:recombinant%20human%20luteinizing%20hormone%20(r-hFSH:r-hLH)%202:1%20combination%20for%20controlled%20ovarian%20stimulation%20during%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20treatment:%20A%20real-world%20study%20of%20routine%20practice%20in%20the%20Russian%20Federation&rft.jtitle=Best%20practice%20&%20research.%20Clinical%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=Koloda,%20Yulia&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=Pt%20B&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=134-148&rft.issn=1521-6934&rft.eissn=1532-1932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2633855402%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2633855402&rft_id=info:pmid/35216907&rft_els_id=S1521693422000189&rfr_iscdi=true