Use of a recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for controlled ovarian stimulation during assisted reproductive technology treatment: A real-world study of routine practice in the Russian Federation

Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive techno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2022-12, Vol.85 (Pt B), p.134-148
Hauptverfasser: Koloda, Yulia, Korsak, Vladislav, Rozenson, Oleg, Anshina, Margarita, Sagamonova, Karina, Baranov, Igor, Yakovenko, Sergey, D'Hooghe, Thomas, Ershova, Anna, Lispi, Monica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Two observational studies in the Russian Federation described patient demographics/clinical decision for treatment with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone:recombinant human luteinizing hormone (r-hFSH:r-hLH) 2:1 combination for ovarian stimulation (OS) during assisted reproductive technology (ART) and outcomes, respectively. The first (prospective) study enrolled 500 patients. After post-hoc regrouping to assign patients to discrete groups, 378 (75.6%) met the local Russian label for an r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination, 105 (21%) were treated according to other physician preference, and 17 (3.4%) met only the ESHRE Bologna criteria for a poor ovarian response. The clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 30.4%. A total of 158/175 (90.3%) women achieving clinical pregnancy in the prospective study participated in the second (retrospective) study. The live birth rate per cycle was 25.8%. No new safety concerns were reported. These results support the use of the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in patients with a poor/suboptimal response to OS for ART treatment in the Russian Federation. •A real-world study of 500 patients prescribed the r-hFSH:r-hLH 2:1 combination in Russia.•A total of 75.6% met the Russian label for a poor or suboptimal response to ovarian stimulation.•A total of 3.4% were treated for a poor ovarian response, and 21% had other indications.•The clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle was 30.4%.•The live birth rate per initiated cycle was 25.8%.
ISSN:1521-6934
1532-1932
1532-1932
DOI:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.01.009