Prognostic significance of blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio in chronic HFpEF
Background The prognostic significance of blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine ratio specifically in chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients remained unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association of BUN/creatinine ratio (baseline level and visit‐to‐visit variation) wi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical investigation 2022-07, Vol.52 (7), p.e13761-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The prognostic significance of blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine ratio specifically in chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients remained unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association of BUN/creatinine ratio (baseline level and visit‐to‐visit variation) with the risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients with chronic HFpEF.
Methods and results
This is a secondary analysis of the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) trial. Of the enrolled 3445 participants in the TOPCAT trial, associations between BUN/creatinine and clinical outcomes were examined in a subset of 1521 (baseline measurements level) and 1453 (visit‐to‐visit variation) participants. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the prognostic significance of BUN/creatinine ratio and BUN/creatinine ratio variation for the prespecified clinical outcomes. A higher BUN/creatinine ratio was associated with a higher risk of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.52, 95%CI, 1.21‐1.91; p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-2972 1365-2362 |
DOI: | 10.1111/eci.13761 |