Comparative evaluation of standard maintenance-dose clopidogrel versus low-dose prasugrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention

Treatment with low-dose prasugrel might be more beneficial even in chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with clopidogrel. We compared platelet reactivity between standard maintenance-dose and low-dose prasugrel in stable CAD patients. This multicenter study enrolled 164 stab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2022-06, Vol.356, p.30-35
Hauptverfasser: Akimaru, Kaoru, Iwabuchi, Masashi, Ishida, Akio, Uehara, Hiroki, Higa, Namio, Kakazu, Masanori, Wake, Minoru, Maeda, Taketoshi, Maeda, Toshiki, Arima, Hisatomi, Ohya, Yusuke, Tokashiki, Shinta, Wakugawa, Hayashi, Miyagi, Ayane, Shiohira, Shinya, Zaima, Satoshi, Shiohira, Tomohiro, Toma, Yuichirou, Ikemiyagi, Hidekazu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Treatment with low-dose prasugrel might be more beneficial even in chronic stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients treated with clopidogrel. We compared platelet reactivity between standard maintenance-dose and low-dose prasugrel in stable CAD patients. This multicenter study enrolled 164 stable CAD patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients were randomly assigned to continue treatment with 75-mg clopidogrel daily (n = 80) or switch to 3.75-mg prasugrel daily (n = 84). Platelet reactivity was evaluated by measuring P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) before randomization and at 5 and 30 days thereafter using the VerifyNow® assay. Patients were classified into three groups according to CYP2C19-clopidogrel metabolic phenotype: extensive (without a *2 or *3 allele), intermediate (one *2 or *3 alleles), or poor (two *2 or *3 alleles) metabolizers. The PRU level was comparable between the two groups at baseline but was significantly lower in the prasugrel group than in the clopidogrel group on days 5 (133.0 vs. 156.8 PRU, P = 0.005) and 30 (124.3 vs. 158.0 PRU, P 
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.02.023