Cabozantinib with or without Panitumumab for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: impact of MET amplification on clinical outcomes and circulating biomarkers
Purpose Acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a hurdle for effective treatment. MET amplification has been indicated as a driver of acquired resistance. Clinical activity has been demonstrated for the combination of EGFR and MET inhibitors in mCRC. But...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology 2022-03, Vol.89 (3), p.413-422 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains a hurdle for effective treatment.
MET
amplification has been indicated as a driver of acquired resistance. Clinical activity has been demonstrated for the combination of EGFR and MET inhibitors in mCRC. But the impact of this regimen on angiogenesis and inflammation remains largely unknown.
Methods
In this non-randomized, open-label phase Ib/II study, four patients were treated with cabozantinib alone and 25 patients received the combination of cabozantinib and panitumumab.
MET
amplification was detected in blood in all four patients treated with cabozantinib monotherapy and 5/25 patients treated with cabozantinib and panitumumab combination therapy. Plasma samples from 28 patients were available for biomarker analysis.
Results
A panel of circulating protein biomarkers was assessed in patient plasma at baseline and on-treatment. Baseline marker levels were analyzed for prognostic value for clinical outcomes, including
MET
amplification as a covariate. HGF and OPN were prognostic for both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while six markers (IL-6, VCAM-1, VEGF-R1, TSP-2, TIMP-1, ICAM-1) were prognostic only for OS. In patients with
MET
amplification, baseline PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, TGF-β1, and VEGF-C levels were significantly higher, whereas baseline TGFβ-R3 levels were significantly lower than
MET
non-amplified patients. On-treatment change of four markers (CD73, PlGF, PDGF-BB, VEGF) were significantly different between
MET
amplified and non-amplified subpopulations.
Conclusion
This study identified circulating HGF and several inflammatory and angiogenic proteins as prognostic biomarkers. Furthermore,
MET
amplification status is associated with both baseline expression and on-treatment modulation of members of angiogenesis and TGF-β pathway proteins.
Clinical trials registration number
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008383. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0344-5704 1432-0843 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00280-022-04404-8 |