Long term cost comparisons of radical cystectomy versus trimodal therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

•Total median costs were significantly higher for TMT than RC at 2-years ($372,839 vs. $191,363) and 5-years ($424,570 vs. $253,651), respectively.•TMT had higher outpatient costs than RC (2-years: $318,221 vs. $100,900; 5-years: $367,092 vs. $146,561).•RC had higher inpatient costs than TMT (2-year...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologic oncology 2022-06, Vol.40 (6), p.273.e1-273.e9
Hauptverfasser: Golla, Vishnukamal, Shan, Yong, Farran, Elias J., Stewart, Courtney A., Vu, Kevin, Yu, Alexander, Khaki, Ali Raza, Parikh, Divya Ahuja, Swanson, Todd A., Keegan, Kirk A., Kamat, Ashish M., Tyler, Douglas S., Freedland, Stephen J., Williams, Stephen B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Total median costs were significantly higher for TMT than RC at 2-years ($372,839 vs. $191,363) and 5-years ($424,570 vs. $253,651), respectively.•TMT had higher outpatient costs than RC (2-years: $318,221 vs. $100,900; 5-years: $367,092 vs. $146,561).•RC had higher inpatient costs than TMT (2-years: $62,240 vs. $33,631; 5-years: $75,499 vs. $45,223).•Excess spending associated with TMT vs. RC was largely driven by outpatient expenditures. Earlier studies on the cost of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatments are limited to short-term costs of care. We determined the 2- and 5-year costs associated with trimodal therapy (TMT) vs. radical cystectomy (RC). We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Total Medicare costs at 2 and 5 years following RC vs. TMT were compared using inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score models. A total of 2,537 patients aged 66 to 85 years were diagnosed with clinical stage T2-4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Total median costs for patients that received no definitive treatment(s) were $73,780 and $88,275 at 2-and 5-years. Costs were significantly higher for TMT than RC at 2-years ($372,839 vs. $191,363, Median Difference $127,815, Hodges-Lehmann Estimate (H-L) 95% Confidence Interval (CI), $112,663–$142,966) and 5-years ($424,570 vs. $253,651, Median Difference $124,466, H-L 95% CI, $105,711–$143,221). TMT had higher outpatient costs than RC (2-years: $318,221 vs. $100,900; 5-years: $367,092 vs. $146,561) with significantly higher costs with radiology, medications, pathology/laboratory, and other professional services. RC had higher inpatient costs than TMT (2-years: $62,240 vs. $33,631, Median Difference $-29,174, H-L 95% CI, $-32,364–$-25,984; 5-years: $75,499 vs. $45,223, Median Difference $-29,843, H-L 95% CI, $-33,905–$-25,781). The excess spending associated with trimodal therapy vs. radical cystectomy was largely driven by outpatient expenditures. The relatively high long-term trimodal therapy costs are prime targets for cost containment strategies to optimize future value-based care.
ISSN:1078-1439
1873-2496
DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.007