Comparison of manual and automated digital image analysis systems for quantification of cellular protein expression

Quantifying protein expression in immunohistochemically stained histological slides is an important tool for oncologic research. The use of computer-aided evaluation of IHC-stained slides significantly contributes to objectify measurements. Manual digital image analysis (mDIA) requires a user-depend...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Histology and histopathology 2022-06, Vol.37 (6), p.18434-541
Hauptverfasser: Jagomast, T, Idel, C, Klapper, L, Kuppler, P, Proppe, L, Beume, S, Falougy, M, Steller, D, Hakim, S G, Offermann, A, Roesch, M C, Bruchhage, K L, Perner, S, Ribbat-Idel, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Quantifying protein expression in immunohistochemically stained histological slides is an important tool for oncologic research. The use of computer-aided evaluation of IHC-stained slides significantly contributes to objectify measurements. Manual digital image analysis (mDIA) requires a user-dependent annotation of the region of interest (ROI). Others have built-in machine learning algorithms with automated digital image analysis (aDIA) and can detect the ROIs automatically. We aimed to investigate the agreement between the results obtained by aDIA and those derived from mDIA systems. We quantified chromogenic intensity (CI) and calculated the positive index (PI) in cohorts of tissue microarrays (TMA) using mDIA and aDIA. To consider the different distributions of staining within cellular sub-compartments and different tumor architecture our study encompassed nuclear and cytoplasmatic stainings in adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas. Within all cohorts, we were able to show a high correlation between mDIA and aDIA for the CI (p
ISSN:1699-5848
DOI:10.14670/HH-18-434