Deep learning–based optimization of a microfluidic membraneless fuel cell for maximum power density via data-driven three-dimensional multiphysics simulation

•Optimization of a MMFC with deep learning-based model (ANN-GA).•Data for ANN was built with a 3D simulation that is equivalent to experiment result.•Conditions provide optimal power are identified by ANN–GA with high accuracy.•ANN–GA model reduces computational and experimental costs of optimizatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2022-03, Vol.348, p.126794-126794, Article 126794
Hauptverfasser: Nguyen, Dang Dinh, Quy Duc Pham, Thinh, Tanveer, Muhammad, Khan, Haroon, Park, Ji Won, Park, Cheol Woo, Kim, Gyu Man
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Optimization of a MMFC with deep learning-based model (ANN-GA).•Data for ANN was built with a 3D simulation that is equivalent to experiment result.•Conditions provide optimal power are identified by ANN–GA with high accuracy.•ANN–GA model reduces computational and experimental costs of optimization process. A deep learning–based method for optimizing a membraneless microfluidic fuel cell (MMFC)performance by combining the artificial neural network (ANN) and genetic algorithm (GA) was for the first time introduced. A three-dimensional multiphysics model that had an accuracy equivalent to experimental results (R2 = 0.976) was employed to generate the ANN’s training data. The constructed ANN is equivalent to the simulation (R2 = 0.999) but with far better computation resource efficiency as the ANN’s execution time is only 0.041 s. The ANN model is then used by the GA to determine the inputs (microchannel length = 10.040 mm, width = 0.501 mm, height = 0.635 mm; temperature = 288.210 K, cell voltage = 0.309 V) that lead to the maximum power density of 0.263 mWcm−2 (current density of 0.852 mAcm−2) of the MMFC. The ANN–GA and numerically calculated maximum power densities differed only by 0.766%.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126794