Psycho‐social perspectives of nonsurgical versus surgical endodontic interventions in persistent endodontic disease
Introduction Patients’ experiences related to dental treatment could influence care‐seeking behaviour and engender personal bias. Although endodontic retreatment and apical surgery are procedures often performed to manage previously treated teeth with persistent disease, there is lack of information...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International endodontic journal 2022-05, Vol.55 (5), p.467-479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Patients’ experiences related to dental treatment could influence care‐seeking behaviour and engender personal bias. Although endodontic retreatment and apical surgery are procedures often performed to manage previously treated teeth with persistent disease, there is lack of information regarding psycho‐social perspectives of patients who undergo these treatments. Our aim was to compare experiences of patients who received these two treatment modalities using a qualitative approach.
Methods
A purposive sample of patients was taken from our previous study utilizing the Oral Health Impact Profile to compare oral health‐related quality of life of 150 patients who received retreatment and apical surgery. Patients who reported impact and no impact were invited to participate in focus group discussions (FGDs). Eighteen patients from the retreatment group and 15 patients from the surgical group participated in six FGDs. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify key themes.
Results
Four themes emerged: (1) psycho‐social disability associated with dental procedures, (2) physical disability associated with dental problems, (3) reliance on dentist's advice for treatment and (4) self‐management to preserve treated teeth. Patients undergoing endodontic retreatment reported significant time loss from work and were less informed of alternative treatment options. However, they were pleased with the aesthetics of their teeth, especially if new crowns were made. Patients undergoing surgery experienced anxiety related to loss of control during surgery and apprehension on visualizing the wound post‐surgery. They reported more impact on their diet, social interaction and sleep quality and some felt self‐conscious due to post‐treatment gingival recession. Patients in both groups placed great trust in professional advice and expressed a clear desire to maintain their natural dentition. There was low awareness regarding long‐term care and future sequelae of their treated tooth.
Conclusions
Patients reported different psycho‐social and physical impacts following endodontic retreatment and apical surgery. Patients undergoing endodontic retreatment were more satisfied with aesthetic outcomes but experienced greater impact related to complexities and length of time taken for treatment. Patients undergoing surgery were better informed of treatment options but experienced greater physical and psycho‐social disability during the recovery phase. Clinicians could consider i |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0143-2885 1365-2591 |
DOI: | 10.1111/iej.13691 |