Next Generation Sequencing of Human Platelet Antigens for Routine Clinical Investigations and Donor Screening

•Genotyping by SNV-based methods has practical and clinical limitations.•NGS has high concordance to SNV-based typing methods and has capacity to identify novel HPA systems and silencing mutations.•Unlike SNV-based methods, NGS offers massive multiplexing potential for donor and prenatal screening i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion medicine reviews 2022-04, Vol.36 (2), p.87-96
Hauptverfasser: Guglielmino, J, Jackson, DE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Genotyping by SNV-based methods has practical and clinical limitations.•NGS has high concordance to SNV-based typing methods and has capacity to identify novel HPA systems and silencing mutations.•Unlike SNV-based methods, NGS offers massive multiplexing potential for donor and prenatal screening in transfusion settings.•High upfront and ongoing costs, data storage and reliable variant calling are major impediments for NGS currently.•Implementation of NGS may become more practical in future with declining costs, improved data management, standardization and improved expertise. Human platelet antigen (HPA) genotyping is performed in a number of clinical scenarios, including characterization of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia and provision of HPA-matched platelets. Current gold-standard methods for HPA genotyping utilize single nucleotide variant (SNV) based approaches. This review aims to ascertain if next generation sequencing (NGS) has reasonable grounds to replace SNV-based genotyping for HPA systems. A systematic review was conducted following a comprehensive literature search in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies were subjected to screening based on a defined set of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Study quality, characteristics and results were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed to assess the concordance of HPA genotyping results between NGS and the SNV-based comparators for HPA-1,-2,-3,-4,-5,-15. In total, 3374 potentially eligible articles were identified, only 6 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion agreement for the overall concordance of the 6 included studies was shown to be 0.998, 95%CI [0.995, 0.999], P < .001. The discrepancies between HPA genotypes obtained by the two platforms were due to allele dropout in real-time PCR, thus discordant results were in favor of NGS over SNV-based comparators. Currently available platforms for NGS are not without their limitations, including high upfront and ongoing costs, data management and storage, accurate variant calling and availability of appropriately trained staff. Despite the high level of concordance between NGS and current gold-standard methods, these significant challenges mean that NGS is currently not viable as a stand-alone technique for HPA typing.
ISSN:0887-7963
1532-9496
DOI:10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.01.001