Examining the cost and impact of dosing fees among clients in opioid agonist treatment: Results from a cross‐sectional survey of Australian treatment clients
Introduction Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) clients frequently bear costs associated with their treatment, including dosing fees. This study aimed to explore the financial and social impact of dosing fees upon clients. Methods Cross‐sectional survey of people who use opioids regularly (N = 402) betw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Drug and alcohol review 2022-05, Vol.41 (4), p.841-850 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) clients frequently bear costs associated with their treatment, including dosing fees. This study aimed to explore the financial and social impact of dosing fees upon clients.
Methods
Cross‐sectional survey of people who use opioids regularly (N = 402) between December 2017 and March 2018, conducted in Australia. Dosing fees were calculated and expressed as percentage of income, by OAT type. Consequences and strategies for difficulties making payments were examined as proportions.
Results
A total of N = 360 participants had ever been in OAT and N = 245 participants currently engaged in OAT reported data on dosing fees, of them 53% (n = 129) reported paying dosing fees. Compared to clients with high levels of dosing supervision, those with moderate or low levels of supervision were more likely to pay dosing fees. The median 28‐day dosing fee was AUD$110 (interquartile range AUD$80); median 28‐day income was AUD$1520 (interquartile range AUD$700). For those who paid dosing fees, the fee comprised |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-5236 1465-3362 1465-3362 |
DOI: | 10.1111/dar.13437 |