How to Score the Peak Oxygen Consumption Obtained Through Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in Individuals after Stroke?
•Different scoring methods of obtaining the VO2peak influence the value measured.•Differences of up to 6 mL.kg.min−1 can be found depending on VO2peak scoring method.•Mean of the last 20-30s or the highest value averaged of the 3 last blocks of 10s should be used. To compare five distinct methods to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases 2022-04, Vol.31 (4), p.106314-106314, Article 106314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Different scoring methods of obtaining the VO2peak influence the value measured.•Differences of up to 6 mL.kg.min−1 can be found depending on VO2peak scoring method.•Mean of the last 20-30s or the highest value averaged of the 3 last blocks of 10s should be used.
To compare five distinct methods to score the peak of oxygen consumption (VO2peak) obtained through the cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in individuals after stroke.
The VO2peak was obtained through the CPET with five methods: method-1: the highest value of the test; method-2: the highest value of the last 30 seconds at peak exercise; method-3: the mean of the last 30 seconds at peak exercise; method-4: the mean of the last 20 seconds at peak exercise; method-5: the highest value averaged of the 3 last blocks of 10 seconds at peak exercise. The coefficient of variance (CV) and the mean differences with 95% confidence interval (CI) between the scoring methods were calculated. A post-hoc test (Tukey HSD) was performed to calculate the adjusted 95%CI.
Fifty-nine individuals were included (54±12 years, 56±60 months after stroke). The CV of the methods 1-to-5 were, respectively: 27.91%, 25.77%, 23.38%, 23.83%, and 23.33%. There was no difference between method-1 and method-2 (95%CI: -1.10 to 4.69) and between methods 3 to 5: method-3 and method-4 (95%CI: -2.97 to 2.82); method-3 and method-5 (95%CI: -3.57 to 2.22); method-4 and method-5 (95%CI: -3.49 to 2.30). However, method-1 and -2 provided VO2peak values different from that of methods 3-to-5.
The scoring method of obtaining the VO2peak has an influence on its magnitude. Since methods 3-to-5 showed lower CV and provided similar values, they should be used to calculate the VO2peak obtained through the CPET in individuals after stroke. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1052-3057 1532-8511 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106314 |