Assessing Whether Medical Students Consistently Ask Patients About Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity as a Function of Year in Training

The Institute of Medicine has suggested that teaching health care providers to inquire about and document the sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) of their patients will provide more accurate epidemiological data and allow for more patient-centered care, thus improving sexual and gender min...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:LGBT health 2022-02, Vol.9 (2), p.142-147
Hauptverfasser: Newsom, Keeley D, Carter, Gregory A, Hille, Jessica J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Institute of Medicine has suggested that teaching health care providers to inquire about and document the sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) of their patients will provide more accurate epidemiological data and allow for more patient-centered care, thus improving sexual and gender minority health. The purpose of this study was to determine whether medical students are asking about SOGI and to identify reasons why students were opting not to ask. In July 2020, an online survey was made available to second-, third-, and fourth-year medical students at a Midwestern medical school. Respondents were asked whether they consistently inquired about the SOGI of their patients, and the reasons they do not ask. The number of students asking about SOGI and reasons for not asking were analyzed using chi-square analyses as a function of year in training. Of 1089 eligible participants, 364 completed the survey (33.4%). The number of students asking about sexual orientation significantly decreased with every year of training (92.8%, 82.2%, and 52.7%). The number of students asking about gender identity significantly decreased after the second year of training (69.9%, 40.6%, and 26.4%). Reasons that significantly increased across training included believing SOGI is irrelevant to encounters, limiting inquiries to patients with sexual health complaints only, and negative influence from their attendings. As medical students progressed into the clinical years of their training, they were less likely to ask their patients about SOGI and more likely to cite negative influence from their attendings and question the relevance of obtaining SOGI.
ISSN:2325-8292
2325-8306
DOI:10.1089/lgbt.2021.0109