Application of Unenhanced Computed Tomography Texture Analysis to Differentiate Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma from Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the application of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) texture analysis in differentiating pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods Preoperative CT images of 112 patients (31 with PASC, 81...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current medical science 2022-02, Vol.42 (1), p.217-225
Hauptverfasser: Ren, Shuai, Tang, Hui-juan, Zhao, Rui, Duan, Shao-feng, Chen, Rong, Wang, Zhong-qiu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the application of unenhanced computed tomography (CT) texture analysis in differentiating pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods Preoperative CT images of 112 patients (31 with PASC, 81 with PDAC) were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 396 texture parameters were extracted from AnalysisKit software for further texture analysis. Texture features were selected for the differentiation of PASC and PDAC by the Mann-Whitney U test, univariate logistic regression analysis, and the minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the texture feature-based model by the random forest (RF) method. Finally, the robustness and reproducibility of the predictive model were assessed by the 10-times leave-group-out cross-validation (LGOCV) method. Results In the present study, 10 texture features to differentiate PASC from PDAC were eventually retained for RF model construction after feature selection. The predictive model had a good classification performance in differentiating PASC from PDAC, with the following characteristics: sensitivity, 95.7%; specificity, 92.5%; accuracy, 94.3%; positive predictive value (PPV), 94.3%; negative predictive value (NPV), 94.3%; and area under the ROC curve (AUC), 0.98. Moreover, the predictive model was proved to be robust and reproducible using the 10-times LGOCV algorithm (sensitivity, 90.0%; specificity, 71.3%; accuracy, 76.8%; PPV, 59.0%; NPV, 95.2%; and AUC, 0.80). Conclusion The unenhanced CT texture analysis has great potential for differentiating PASC from PDAC.
ISSN:2096-5230
1672-0733
2523-899X
DOI:10.1007/s11596-022-2535-2