Do Smokers' Harm Perceptions of Cigarillos Differ by Modified Use of the Tobacco Product? Findings From Waves 3 and 4 of the PATH Study
Objective: The harm perceptions of individuals who smoke either blunts or the Black & Mild (B&M) brand, which is often "freaked," have seldom been investigated. Since these practices could affect users' perceived health risks of the cigarillo, this study was intended to compar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychology of addictive behaviors 2022-12, Vol.36 (8), p.965-971 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective:
The harm perceptions of individuals who smoke either blunts or the Black & Mild (B&M) brand, which is often "freaked," have seldom been investigated. Since these practices could affect users' perceived health risks of the cigarillo, this study was intended to compare such risks among cigarillo users by modified use of the tobacco product.
Method:
Adult cigarillo and blunt smokers were selected from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study for cross-sectional (Wave 4; n = 3,331) and longitudinal (Waves 3-4; n = 1,898) analyses of predictors of general and relative harm perceptions of cigarillos. Ordinal and multinomial logistic regression methods were employed for testing whether adjusted odds of perceiving cigarillo harms were greater in blunt versus cigarillo smokers. In a separate model (n = 1,258), preference for B&M cigarillos was examined as a correlate of harm perception due to the perceived health benefits of removing the inner tobacco liner.
Results:
Cross-sectional estimates indicated that blunt smokers, mixed cigarillo/blunt smokers, and those who preferred B&M brand perceived significantly more risk than conventional cigarillo smokers. Longitudinal estimates indicated that among those who underwent a transition in use, former blunt and former cigarillo smokers had significantly greater odds of reporting an increase in perceived harm compared to new users.
Conclusions:
The change in blunt smokers' harm perceptions upon transitioning in blunt use suggests acknowledgment of the harm of using cigarillos in some form. Given their high perceived risk of cigarillos, blunt smokers might be receptive to replacing the tobacco product with a nontobacco wrap.
Public Health Significance Statement
This study indicates that individuals who modify cigarillos for harm reduction and/or cannabis delivery perceive more harm from smoking cigarillos than those who use the product as intended. This finding has important implications for blunt smokers who may be receptive to switching to a nontobacco product. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0893-164X 1939-1501 1939-1501 |
DOI: | 10.1037/adb0000819 |