The diagnostic performance of ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis system for distinguishing breast masses: a prospective multicenter study

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software on ultrasound in distinguishing benign and malignant breast masses and avoiding unnecessary biopsy. Methods This prospective, multicenter study included patients who were scheduled for pathological diagnosis of br...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2022-06, Vol.32 (6), p.4046-4055
Hauptverfasser: Wei, Qi, Yan, Yu-Jing, Wu, Ge-Ge, Ye, Xi-Rong, Jiang, Fan, Liu, Jie, Wang, Gang, Wang, Yi, Song, Juan, Pan, Zhi-Ping, Hu, Jin-Hua, Jin, Chao-Ying, Wang, Xiang, Dietrich, Christoph F., Cui, Xin-Wu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software on ultrasound in distinguishing benign and malignant breast masses and avoiding unnecessary biopsy. Methods This prospective, multicenter study included patients who were scheduled for pathological diagnosis of breast masses between April 2019 and November 2020. Ultrasound images, videos, CAD analysis, and BI-RADS were obtained. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated and compared with radiologists. Results Overall, 901 breast masses in 901 patients were enrolled in this study. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of CAD software were 89.6%, 94.2%, 87.0%, 80.4%, and 96.3, respectively, in the long-axis section; 89.0%, 91.4%, 87.7%, 80.8%, and 94.7%, respectively, in the short-axis section. With BI-RADS 4a as the cut-off value, CAD software has a higher AUC (0.906 vs 0.734 vs 0.696, all p  
ISSN:1432-1084
0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-021-08452-1