The still-face paradigm in Latin American mother–child dyads at 2 and 3 years: Effects of socioeconomic status and temperament

•The typical respond was found in Latin American toddlers from low-to-mid SES.•Older children and children with higher SES exhibited better emotion regulation.•There were few associations between emotion regulation and temperament.•No gender differences were found at emotion regulation behaviors. The still-face paradigm (SFP) is a common method in infancy used to assess emotion regulation and interactions when an adult (typically the caregiver) abruptly stops a positive interaction with a child and switches to a more neutral affect. The effect of this paradigm has been studied in different countries and age ranges, but research in Latin America and with toddlers (e.g., 2–3 years old) of different socioeconomic backgrounds is scarce. The current study analyzed caregiver–child interactions in this novel sample, to analyze the possibility of generalization of the typical response of this paradigm (i.e., less positive affect, reduced gaze, and more negative affect in children when parent affect changes). The sample consisted of 114 caregiver–child dyads from low to middle socioeconomic status (SES) (children’s Mage = 26.61 months, SD = 6.73, range = 18–36; 61 girls). The SFP modified version (i.e., on the floor and with a series of standardized toys), the temperament Early Childhood Behavior Questionnaire adapted for Argentina, and an SES scale were used. The typical SFP response was observed in Latin American children. In addition, older children and children with higher SES exhibited better general regulation, and there were weak associations with temperament. For gender differences, boys demonstrated more aggressive behaviors at Phase II. Results from this study suggest that children’s response to this paradigm is an unconditional response to the lack of social reinforcers and is only partially associated with social and individual variables.